donderdag 10 september 2020

Trump knew Covid was deadly but wanted to ‘play it down’, Woodward book says

 
Trump knew Covid was deadly but wanted to ‘play it down’, Woodward book says

US president gave Bob Woodward 18 interviews, forming basis of new book Rage, and said of virus: ‘This is deadly stuff’

 'I don't want to create panic': Trump defends coronavirus remarks he made to Bob Woodward – video

Donald Trump knew the extent of the deadly coronavirus threat in February but intentionally misled the public by deciding to “play it down”, according to interviews recorded by one of America’s most venerated investigative journalists.

The US president gave Bob Woodward 18 interviews between December 2019 and July 2020. They form the basis of his revelatory new book, Rage, obtained on Wednesday by the Washington Post and CNN, in which Trump is condemned by his own words.

Just two months before he seeks re-election, Trump is quoted describing former president George W Bush as “a stupid moron” and mocking the Black Lives Matter movement for racial equality and an end to police brutality.

The book also reports that the US may have come close to nuclear war with North Korea in 2017.

Rage displays the chasm between Trump’s public and private statements on the Covid-19 pandemic, which has killed more than 190,000 Americans and caused the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression.

As early as 28 January 2020, Robert O’Brien, the national security adviser, gave him a “jarring” warning, informing the president that Covid-19 would be the “biggest national security threat” of his presidency. Trump’s head “popped up”, the book says.

Three days later, Trump announced restrictions on travel from China, although the virus was already in the United States.

On 7 February he told Woodward in a phone call: “It goes through the air. That’s always tougher than the touch. You don’t have to touch things. Right? But the air, you just breathe the air and that’s how it’s passed. And so that’s a very tricky one. That’s a very delicate one. It’s also more deadly than even your strenuous flus.”

He added: “This is deadly stuff.”

But February, in the view of Woodward and many other analysts, was a wasted month. On 27 February, Trump said publicly: “It’s going to disappear. One day – it’s like a miracle – it will disappear.” In a tweet on 9 March, he explicitly compared it to the common flu, noting that “Nothing is shut down, life & the economy go on” in flu season. “Think about that!”

By 19 March, Trump had declared a national emergency but told Woodward: “I wanted to always play it down. I still like playing it down, because I don’t want to create a panic.”

At the White House on Wednesday, Trump dismissed the book as “just another political hit job” and sought to defend his handling of the pandemic.

He added: “And certainly I’m not going to drive this country or the world into a frenzy. We wanna show confidence, we wanna show strength as a nation, and that’s what I’ve done. And we’ve done very well from any standard. You look at our numbers compared to other countries, other parts of the world, it’s an amazing job that we’ve done.”

America has the highest caseload (6.35m infections) and highest death toll (190,815) in the world, according to Johns Hopkins university figures. It also has one of the highest fatality rates per 100,000 population, at 57.97.

Later, Trump told Fox News: “I said don’t panic. I’m a cheerleader for this country and I don’t want to see panic.”

Speaking at an election campaign event in Warren, Michigan, on Wednesday afternoon, the Democratic presidential candidate, Joe Biden, reacted to the reports by saying: “He knew how deadly it was. It was much more deadly than the flu. He knew and purposely played it down. Worse, he lied to the American people. He knowingly and willingly lied about the threat it posed to the country for months.”

Biden added: “He had the information. He knew how dangerous it was and, while this deadly disease ripped through our nation, he failed to do his job on purpose. It was a life and death betrayal of the American people. Experts say that if he’d acted just one week sooner, 36,000 people would have been saved.”

Nancy Pelosi, the Democratic House speaker, told the MSNBC network: “I think what he said connotes two things. One, his weakness: he didn’t know how to cope with the challenge to our country.

“Secondly, his disdain and denial for science, which has the answers, we could have contained this early on. But bigger than all of that was his total disregard for the impact on individual families in our country.”

At a White House coronavirus taskforce briefing on 3 April, Trump was still minimising the virus.

“I said it’s going away and it is going away, ” he said. But just two days later, he told Woodward: “It’s a horrible thing. It’s unbelievable.” On 13 April, he acknowledged: “It’s so easily transmissible, you wouldn’t even believe it.”

Dr Anthony Fauci, Mike Pence, Dr Deborah Birx and Adm Brett Giroir listen as Donald Trump speaks during a coronavirus taskforce briefing on 17 April.
Pinterest
 Dr Anthony Fauci, Mike Pence, Dr Deborah Birx and Adm Brett Giroir listen as Donald Trump speaks during a coronavirus taskforce briefing on 17 April. Photograph: Jim Watson/AFP via Getty Images

In May, Woodward asked Trump if he remembered O’Brien’s dire warning on 28 January. He replied: “No, I don’t, I’m sure if he said it – you know, I’m sure he said it. Nice guy.”

And in their final interview in July, Trump sought to duck responsibility, telling Woodward: “The virus has nothing to do with me. It’s not my fault. It’s … China let the damn virus out.”

Rage also contains damning views of Trump’s failures to lead on the virus response, for example his unwillingness to order economic lockdowns, and prevarications and resistance for months over mask wearing.

Anthony Fauci, the country’s top infectious disease expert, is quoted describing Trump’s leadership as “rudderless” and saying his “attention span is like a minus number”.

Fauci is reported to have said: “His sole purpose is to get re-elected.”

Woodward, 77, is a two-time Pulitzer prize winner and has written about nine American presidents. His reporting with Washington Post colleague Carl Bernstein on the Watergate break-in and cover-up helped bring about Richard Nixon’s resignation. Trump has expressed admiration for Nixon and is currently echoing his “law and order” election strategy.

But Trump said Woodward made Bush “look like a stupid moron, which he was”, according to the book, and said of Barack Obama: “I don’t think Obama’s smart … I think he’s highly overrated. And I don’t think he’s a great speaker.”

He also told Woodward that the North Korean dictator, Kim Jong-un, thought Obama was an “asshole”.

In June, at the height of protests against racial injustice after the police killing of George Floyd in Minneapolis in May, Woodward suggested to Trump that white and privileged men like them need to appreciate the plight of African Americans.

Trump replied, “No,” in a mocking voice. “You really drank the Kool-Aid, didn’t you? Just listen to you. Wow. No, I don’t feel that at all.”

Meanwhile Jared Kushner, Trump’s son-in-law and senior adviser, is quoted as saying that four texts are key to understanding Trump, including Lewis Carroll’s Alice in Wonderland. Kushner paraphrased the Cheshire Cat from the book: “If you don’t know where you’re going, any path will get you there.”

Woodward also writes that Trump’s national security team warned that the US may have come close to nuclear war with North Korea in 2017. James Mattis, then the defence secretary, slept in his clothes to be ready in the event of a North Korean missile launch and prayed at the Washington national cathedral. Mike Pompeo, the secretary of state, is quoted as saying: “We never knew whether it was real, or whether it was a bluff.”

 'I don't want to create panic': Trump defends coronavirus remarks he made to Bob Woodward – video

Mysteriously, Trump bragged to Woodward about a new secret weapons system: “I have built a nuclear – a weapons system that nobody’s ever had in this country before.” Woodward writes that other sources corroborated the claim but were surprised that Trump revealed it.

Woodward obtained the 27 “love letters” Trump exchanged with Kim. Kim flatters Trump by repeatedly calling him “Your Excellency”, and writes that the “deep and special friendship between us will work as a magical force”. Kim says in another that meeting again would be “reminiscent of a scene from a fantasy film”.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/sep/09/trump-bob-woodward-book-rage-coronavirus

Trump loyalists interfered to downplay Russia election threat – whistleblower

 


Trump loyalists interfered to downplay Russia election threat – whistleblower

Brian Murphy says he was demoted for refusing to accept fabrication of intelligence to match Donald Trump’s rhetoric



Trump in February with Chad Wolf, the acting homeland security chief. Wolf reportedly told Murphy his Russia assessment should be ‘held … [because it] made the president look bad.’ Photograph: Kevin Lamarque/Reuters


 in Washington

Trump loyalists running the Department of Homeland Security manipulated intelligence reports to play down the threat of Russian election interference and white supremacists and exaggerate the threat of Antifa and anarchist groups, according to the department’s former top intelligence official.

The official, Brian Murphy, said he was demoted in August from his position running the department’s office of intelligence and analysis, because of his refusal to go along with the fabrication of intelligence to match Donald Trump’s rhetoric, and for making formal complaints about the political pressure. He filed a whistleblower reprisal complaint on Tuesday.

In his complaint, Murphy alleges that the efforts to falsify DHS intelligence dated back to 2018, when the then homeland security secretary Kirstjen Nielsen asked his office to inflate the numbers of known or suspected terrorists crossing the border with Mexico, in support of Trump’s demand for a border wall.

Murphy said the intelligence identified three such terrorist cases. In December 2018, Nielsen told the House judiciary committee there were 3,755.

According to Murphy’s testimony, Nielsen and her successor, Chad Wolf, continued to exaggerate the terrorist threat at the border in 2019, while being aware of the real figures.

Murphy’s most serious allegations concern the effort to downplay Russian meddling in the election, while it was actually under way in the course of the campaign. In May this year, Murphy said Wolf told him “to cease providing intelligence assessments on the threat of Russian interference in the United States, and instead start reporting on interference activities by China and Iran”.

Wolf told Murphy the orders came from the national security adviser, Robert O’Brien.

“Mr Murphy informed Mr Wolf he would not comply with these instructions, as doing so would put the country in substantial and specific danger,” the whistleblower complaint says.

On 7 July, Murphy was told to stop circulating any information about Russian disinformation efforts until he met Wolf. The next day, according to the complaint, the acting homeland security secretary told Murphy the assessment of the Russian role “should be “held” because it “made the president look bad”.

When Murphy objected, he was excluded from meetings on the subject, and an alternative assessment was leaked to the press which put Russian interference on a par with China and Iran – an equivalence which Murphy, and most intelligence experts, say is not supported by the facts.

Top administration officials including the director of national intelligence, John Ratcliffe, and the secretary of state, Mike Pompeo, have claimed that China is as big a threat, if not a much greater danger, to the integrity of the US elections than Russia, with the implication that China favours Trump’s Democratic challenger, Joe Biden. No substantial evidence has been presented to support that claim, which is contradicted by a vast amount of material, including reports by the special counsel Robert Mueller, and the Republican-led Senate intelligence committee, detailing Russian interference.

According to the whistleblower complaint, a homeland threat assessment (HTA) drawn up by Murphy’s intelligence analysts in March this year was also blocked by Wolf and other DHS political appointees because of its sections on Russian interference and the white supremacist threat.

Murphy was told by his superiors he “needed to specifically modify the section on white supremacy in a manner that made the threat appear less severe, as well as include information on the prominence of violent ‘leftwing’ groups”. When he refused, the HTA was taken out of his hands.

“It is Mr Murphy’s assessment that the final version of the HTA will more closely resemble a policy document with references to antifa and “anarchist” groups than an intelligence document,” his complaint said.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/sep/09/trump-whistleblower-russia-election-threat

zondag 6 september 2020

GroenLinks-leider Klaver keert zich tegen coronawet

Voorpagina

GroenLinks-leider Klaver keert zich tegen coronawet


GroenLinks-leider Klaver keert zich tegen coronawet | NU - Het laatste  nieuws het eerst op NU.nl



06 september 2020 07:00

GroenLinks zal niet instemmen met de Tijdelijke wet maatregelen COVID-19, beter bekend als de coronawet of coronaspoedwet. Volgens GroenLinks-leider Jesse Klaver zet de wet de Tweede Kamer buitenspel en geeft die ministers Hugo de Jonge (Volksgezondheid) en Ferd Grapperhaus (Justitie en Veiligheid) de macht om zonder goedkeuring van de volksvertegenwoordiging vrijheden verregaand in te perken.
"Deze wet maakt het voor het kabinet mogelijk om per decreet te regeren. Zoals de wet er nu ligt, zal GroenLinks tegenstemmen", zegt Klaver tegen NU.nl. "Als volksvertegenwoordiging mogen we dit niet laten gebeuren."
Op dit moment zijn de coronaregels vastgelegd in lokale noodverordeningen, maar critici wijzen erop dat de noodmaatregelen niet voor een langere periode bedoeld zijn. Daarnaast kondigen de voorzitters van de veiligheidsregio's de verordeningen af en daardoor ontbreekt de democratische controle van gemeenteraden en het parlement.
Het kabinet komt daarom met een wetsvoorstel dat de coronaregels wettelijk moet verankeren. Maar onder anderen juristen en demonstranten hebben kritiek op dat voorstel.
Afgelopen vrijdag stond opnieuw een gemêleerd gezelschap op het Malieveld te demonstreren tegen de coronaspoedwet. Naast complotdenkers die Kamerlid Pieter Omtzigt belaagden, zag Klaver ook demonstranten die zich oprecht zorgen maken over de macht die het kabinet met de coronawet krijgt.
"Over de viruswaanzinnigen heb ik eigenlijk niet veel goeds te zeggen, omdat ik vind dat ze misinformatie verspreiden en dat is gevaarlijk. Maar de meeste mensen die zich tegen de spoedwet keren, zijn geen viruswaanzinnigen. Zij zijn weldenkende burgers die niet willen dat een minister zoveel macht krijgt zonder controle van de volksvertegenwoordiging."
"De vragen die zij stellen, vind ik terecht en daar moeten we als politiek over debatteren. Zij zien volle vliegtuigen naar vakantiebestemmingen vliegen, terwijl de theaters de deuren gesloten moeten houden."
Dan kun je als kabinet zeggen: we versoepelen de regels voor de culturele sector en dan zijn wij van de protesten tegen de spoedwet af.
"Dat is niet genoeg. De wet zit echt niet goed in elkaar. De minister kan zonder goedkeuring van het parlement grondrechten inperken. Ja, om het virus te bestrijden, mogen grondrechten worden ingeperkt. Ik zeg alleen dat dit via de volksvertegenwoordiging moet gebeuren. Zoals de wet er nu ligt, zal GroenLinks daarom tegenstemmen."
Wat u regeren per decreet noemt, komt erop neer dat de minister met de coronawet snel maatregelen kan nemen om in te grijpen met een zogenoemde ministeriële regeling. Gezien de noodzaak om snel te kunnen handelen, zegt het kabinet dat dit beter is dan een wetgevingstraject waarin de Kamer alleen maar voor vertraging zal zorgen.
"In de coronacrisis, maar ook in andere crises, heeft het parlement eensgezind opgetreden en laten zien heel snel te kunnen handelen. Nog niet zo lang geleden heeft dit parlement een steunpakket van 50 miljard euro in drie uur tijd behandeld. Dat is ongekend, maar het was nodig. Om te doen alsof je als minister niet kan besturen omdat het parlement in de weg zou zitten, is echt nonsens."
Het kabinet zegt het parlement met de coronawet juist die democratische rol te willen geven. De coronaregels zijn nu niet democratisch, omdat die per lokale noodverordeningen buiten de gemeenteraden en het parlement om geregeld zijn.
"Er wordt voortdurend gezegd dat het kabinet dit doet om de democratie te versterken, maar het parlement krijgt geen rol."
"Bijna alle juristen zeggen dat er nu geen goede wettelijke basis voor ingrijpende coronaregels is, omdat een noodverordening van korte duur moet zijn. Maar de macht die de minister in deze wet krijgt om naar eigen inzicht grondrechten in te perken, past niet in een parlementaire democratie."
"Ik denk dat hoe langer de corona-crisis duurt, hoe meer de volksvertegenwoordiging moet worden meegenomen in de maatregelen die het kabinet wil nemen, in plaats van dat premier Mark Rutte en minister Hugo de Jonge die via een persconferentie bekendmaken. Het is ook belangrijk voor het draagvlak dat alle argumenten in een open debat worden gewisseld."
Rutte leek afgelopen dinsdag een handreiking te doen in de richting van deze groep door te zeggen dat er niet één waarheid is in de aanpak van het coronavirus en dat hij bereid is naar alle kritiek te luisteren. Waarom is dat signaal niet voldoende?
"Het gaat er niet om dat de premier alleen zegt dat het kabinet ieder signaal hoort. Ik denk dat mensen behoefte hebben aan perspectief op langere termijn. Dat perspectief is er niet. De strategie lijkt te zijn dat het kabinet wacht op een vaccin. Als dat er niet komt, dan moeten we inzetten op een behandelmethode."
"Maar wat als dat niet lukt of langer duurt dan we inschatten? Wat is dan het plan voor de komende maanden? Hoe richten we de samenleving dan in?"
Het kabinet verwacht begin 2021 een vaccin en zegt tot die tijd: 'Houd vol en houd je aan de regels.' Dat is volgens u niet genoeg?
"Ik hoop ook dat we dan een vaccin hebben, maar we moeten ook nadenken over het scenario waarin dat onverhoopt niet lukt. Dan denk ik dat je toe moet naar een testsamenleving."
"Dat vraagt dat we op nog veel grotere schaal en veel sneller moeten testen om het mogelijk te maken dat we weer een beetje normaal kunnen doen."
"Het is toch raar dat de Tour de France wel kan rondfietsen en de voetballers om de drie dagen getest kunnen worden, maar dat dit in het onderwijs of de zorg niet kan?"

vrijdag 4 september 2020

Antifa Activist Wanted In Connection to Portland Shooting Has Reportedly Been Killed By Police



Antifa Activist Wanted In Connection to Portland Shooting Has Reportedly Been Killed By Police

Michael Forest Reinoehl was wanted in connection to the killing of a member of the right wing group "Patriot Prayer."
September 4, 2020
Antifacist activist Michael Forest Reinoehl was killed by police as they attempted to arrest him near Seattle
ANTIFACIST ACTIVIST MICHAEL FOREST REINOEHL WAS KILLED BY POLICE AS THEY ATTEMPTED TO ARREST HIM NEAR SEATTLE. (VICE NEWS)
Antifacist activist Michael Reinoehl was killed by police as they attempted to arrest him near Seattle, hours after VICE News shared a conversation with him in which he appeared to admit that he shot a right-wing protester.

Reinoehl, 48, was killed in an encounter with officers when a federal fugitive task force attempted to arrest him, according to The New York Times. An anonymous official told the Associated Press that Reinoehl had pulled a gun during the incident.

The official could not discuss the matter publicly and spoke to the AP on condition of anonymit

An arrest warrant had been issued on the same day VICE News published a clip in which Reinoehl said he acted in self-defense in the killing of Aaron “Jay” Danielson, a member of the right-wing group “Patriot Prayer,” during a confrontation during a pro-Trump rally.

“I had no choice. I mean, I, I had a choice. I could have sat there and watched them kill a friend of mine of color. But I wasn't going to do that,” he said.

Since the shooting, Reinoehl said he’s gone into hiding, and moved his children to a safe place after shots were fired into his house just hours after the incident. He had not turned himself in, he said, because he believed right-wing protesters were collaborating with police, who would not protect him or his family.

Two weeks later, he said, he had no regrets about his actions. “If the life of anybody I care about is in danger, and there's something I can do to prevent it … I think that any good human being would do the same thing,” he said.