zaterdag 11 februari 2017

Revealed: FBI terrorism taskforce investigating Standing Rock activists



Afbeeldingsresultaat voor logo the guardian

Revealed: FBI terrorism taskforce investigating Standing Rock activists

FBI representatives have contacted several ‘water protectors’, raising alarm that an indigenous-led movement is being construed as domestic terrorism

A permit has been granted for the oil pipeline to cross the Missouri river, following Donald Trump’s executive order.  A permit has been granted for the oil pipeline to cross the Missouri river, following Donald Trump’s executive order. Photograph: UPI / Barcroft Images

The FBI is investigating political activists campaigning against the Dakota Access pipeline, diverting agents charged with preventing terrorist attacks to instead focus their attention on indigenous activists and environmentalists.
The Guardian has established that multiple officers within the FBI’s joint terrorism taskforce have attempted to contact at least three people tied to the Standing Rock “water protector” movement in North Dakota.
The purpose of the officers’ inquiries into Standing Rock, and scope of the task force’s work, remains unknown. Agency officials declined to comment. But the fact that the officers have even tried to communicate with activists is alarming to free-speech experts who argue that anti-terrorism agents have no business scrutinizing protesters.
“The idea that the government would attempt to construe this indigenous-led non-violent movement into some kind of domestic terrorism investigation is unfathomable to me,” said Lauren Regan, a civil rights attorney who has provided legal support to demonstrators who were contacted by representatives of the FBI. “It’s outrageous, it’s unwarranted … and it’s unconstitutional.”
Regan, who has regularly visited Standing Rock and is the executive director of the Civil Liberties Defense Center in Oregon, said she learned of three cases in which officers with the taskforce, known as the JTTF, tried to talk to activists in person. She described the encounters as attempted “knocks and talks”, meaning law enforcement showed up at people’s doors without a subpoena or warrant and tried to get them to voluntarily cooperate with an interview.
The three individuals, who include a Native American and a non-indigenous activist, asserted their fifth amendment rights and did not respond to the officers, according to Regan, who declined to identify them to protect their privacy and out of fear of retribution.
Construction equipment near the Dakota Access pipeline. Workers have begun drilling after the army corps granted the permit necessary.
Pinterest
 Construction equipment near the Dakota Access pipeline. Workers have begun drilling after the army corps granted the permit necessary. Photograph: Josh Morgan/Reuters
Two of them were contacted in North Dakota and a third at their home outside the state, according to Regan. She said all three contacts were made in recent weeks after Trump’s inauguration.
Trump, a former investor in Energy Transfer Partners, the Texas-based firm behind the pipeline, took executive action in his first week in office to expedite the project. On Wednesday, workers began drilling to complete the pipeline across the Missouri river.
The JTTF revelation comes at a time when there have been increasing concerns at Standing Rock about law enforcement surveillancepolice violence and the targeted arrests and prosecutions of activists.
Since the summer, law enforcement officials have made roughly 700 arrests, in some cases leading to serious felony charges and possibly lengthy state prison sentences. Following recent indictments, at least six activists are now facing charges in federal court. Rumors about JTTF have caused further stress among the activists.
Regan said she was able to confirm the identity of one of the JTTF officers, Andrew Creed, who attempted to contact an activist. Reached by phone, he declined to comment to the Guardian, saying, “I can’t talk to you” before hanging up.
An FBI spokesman, Jeffrey Van Nest, also declined to answer any questions, saying: “We’re not in a position to provide a comment as to the existence of an investigation.”
In November, a JTTF officer also showed up to the hospital room of Sophia Wilansky, a 21-year-old who was seriously injured during a standoff with law enforcement at Standing Rock, according to her father, Wayne Wilansky. The FBI took her clothes and still have not returned them, he said in an interview this week.
Wayne said he suspected that the FBI brought a terrorism agent given that local police had alleged that activists set off an explosion that caused his daughter’s injuries. Witnesses have said they believe she was hit by a police concussion grenade.
The timing of the FBI hospital visit in Minneapolis was upsetting, he added. “It was especially disturbing, because Sophia’s blood pressure was going up. She was about to be wheeled into surgery.”
Activists at Standing Rock have faced blizzard conditions at the camp during the winter months.
Pinterest
 Activists at Standing Rock have faced blizzard conditions at the camp during the winter months. Photograph: Michael Nigro/Pacific/Barcroft
Police have repeatedly painted the anti-pipeline movement as dangerous, which is why JTTF may be involved, Regan said.
“From the very beginning, local law enforcement has attempted to justify its militarized presence … by making false allegations that somehow these water protectors were violent.”
The attorney said it also seemed likely that JTTF may have contacted other water protectors and said she worried they may not have realized their best option is to remain silent and contact a lawyer.
This is not the first time the JTTF has been tied to an investigation of civil rights protesters. Records from Minnesota suggested that the taskforce monitored a Black Lives Matter demonstration.
For indigenous leaders who have vowed to continue fighting the pipeline on the ground, the FBI investigations and ongoing federal prosecutions have become increasingly worrisome. It’s particularly troubling to some given the US government’s history of aggressively targeting Native American protesters and turning them into political prisoners.
“This is history repeating itself,” said LaDonna Brave Bull Allard, who founded the first camp opposing the pipeline. “I keep on thinking, how we did come to this point? … When did Americans lose their rights? When did America stop following the law?”
Brandy-Lee Maxie, a 34-year-old Nakota tribe member from Canada, said it’s difficult not to worry about possible prosecution. But the cause, she said, is too important to give up: “I’m staying here. Whatever happens to those who stay happens. We’ve just gotta keep praying.”

woensdag 8 februari 2017

Netanyahu wants to repress my group, Breaking the Silence. May, don’t help him..

Afbeeldingsresultaat voor logo the guardian

Netanyahu wants to repress my group, Breaking the Silence. May, don’t help him..





Israel’s friends in the UK should fight to protect funding for an organisation that bears witness to the moral price paid for the maltreatment of Palestinians


Prime Minister of Israel Benjamin Netanyahu Meets British Prime Minister Theresa May‘I can shed some light why Netanyahu is so intent on stopping us, an organisation of soldiers who encourage public debate on the reality of occupation.’ Photograph: Tang/Zuma wire/Rex Features


On Monday the Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, met with his British counterpart, Theresa May. Among other things, he asked her to stop the UK government’s funding of the group I co-founded, Breaking the Silence, as well as other human rights organisations in Israel and Palestine. This is regardless of the fact that Breaking the Silence has not received funding from the British government since 2011.
As an Israeli, it’s not my place to tell Netanyahu to stop interfering in decisions made by the British government. That’s something British citizens can do. What I can do is shed some light on the reason Netanyahu is so intent on stopping us, an organisation of soldiers who encourage public debate on the reality of occupation and the moral price it exacts from Israelis.
As Netanyahu made his way back to Israel, the Knesset passed the regulation bill, a land expropriation law that seeks to retroactively legalise the theft of Palestinian land by Israel for the benefit of settlement development.
There’s nothing new about stealing Palestinian land for the purpose of settlement expansion. This is what Israel has been doing for nearly 50 years. It’s the only way we could have installed 700,000 Israeli settlers across the green line. Sometimes this land grab is achieved by declaring Palestinian land “state land” (Israeli property), and sometimes by sealing an area off for security purposes.
What’s new about the passing of this bill is that legislation concerning what goes on in Palestine – which until now was subject to the Israeli Defense Forces (the sovereign entity in Palestine) – was decided for the first time by the Israeli parliament, a body that Palestinians cannot vote for, and which therefore does not represent them.
In so doing, the Israeli parliament took my country one step closer towards being an apartheid state. But more than anything else, the regulation law clearly indicates that the Israeli government is neither interested in ending the occupation nor in achieving a two-state solution.
For the soldiers involved with Breaking the Silence, who served in Palestine and enforced the policy of occupation, this is not new. This reality became clear to me during my first days serving in the heart of Hebron. I was one of 650 combatants guarding 850 settlers in a city of 200,000 Palestinians.
One of our main missions was to “make our presence felt”. The idea was that if Palestinians experienced IDF presence in any place, at any time of day, they would be deterred from carrying out attacks. We operated three patrols in Hebron for this purpose. Day and night, we would go into the Casbah, the Old City of Hebron. Entirely at random, rather than on the basis of any intelligence, the officer or sergeant would pick a house. We woke up a family at two in the morning, fully armed, and searched the house – for no reason.
We then started knocking on the doors of houses and shops to make noise, in the middle of the night. We ran to the other side of the Old City, entered another house – and this continued for eight hours, until the end of our shift.
This has been the protocol: 24 hours a day, seven days a week, since the start of the second intifada in September 2000. The sole purpose was to intimidate the Palestinian population through what we called “creating a sense of persecution”. Because this is what you have to do, when you want to maintain control over millions of people with no rights, and with no endgame in sight. The only way to do it is to induce constant fear, and as soon as this fear becomes routine, ramp it up more, to no end.
This is the kind of behaviour was carried out in the interest of bolstering occupation, not ending it. These are not the policies implemented by people who desire to live peacefully alongside millions of Palestinians in the West Bank, but rather by those seeking to control them forever.
This is the policy Netanyahu seeks to uphold, and why it’s so important to him to stop us or anyone else who tries to resist it. As Israelis, we must ask ourselves what kind of Israel we want, a democratic state or an apartheid state. We at Breaking the Silence choose democracy and human rights – and that’s why we’re working tirelessly to oppose the occupation.
Friends of Israel in the UK should ask themselves what it means to be pro-Israel: is it helping Netanyahu maintain the occupation, turning us into an apartheid state? Or is it helping to restore democracy through ending the occupation, thus actualising a two-state solution?

maandag 6 februari 2017

Israel passes bill retroactively legalising Jewish settlements



Afbeeldingsresultaat voor logo the guardian

Israel passes bill retroactively legalising Jewish settlements

The bill was supported by Benjamin Netanyahu, but opponents said the law ‘makes theft an official Israeli policy’

Benjamin Netanyahu Benjamin Netanyahu was in London on Monday but said he would fly back to Israel for the vote. Photograph: Getty Images




Israel’s parliament has approved a controversial bill to retroactively “legalise” illegal Jewish outposts built on privately owned Palestinian land, setting up an inevitable confrontation with the international community.
The so-called ‘Regulation Bill’ paves the way for Israel to recognise thousands of illegally built Jewish settler homes constructed on privately-owned Palestinian land in what opponents have dubbed a ‘theft’ and ‘land grab’.
The law retroactively legalises the construction, with the original landowners to be compensated either with money or alternative land – even if they do not agree to give up their property.
The new law is the latest in a series of pro-settlement moves by Israel since the inauguration of US president Donald Trump, that has seen some 6000 new Jewish settlement homes announced in the occupied Palestinian territoriesin the past fortnight.
Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu told reporters at the end of his visit to London to meet UK prime minister Theresa May on Monday that he had informed the White House the vote would take place tonight, and had indicated he would support its passage.
The new law - which is likely to face an almost immediate challenge in the courts - was condemned by the Israeli opposition leader Isaac Herzog, who warned ahead of the vote would lead to Israel being tried at the international criminal court.
Comparing the legislation to a ‘freight train’, Herzog added: “Its cars will carry international indictments against Israeli and Jewish soldiers and officers. This indictment will be signed by the prime minister of Israel.”
The law was quickly condemned by human rights groups including Peace, which issued a statement accusing the Israeli prime minister of being “willing to compromise the future of both Israelis and Palestinians in order to satisfy a small group of extreme settlers for the sake of his own political survival.
“By passing this law, Netanyahu makes theft an official Israeli policy and stains the Israeli law books.”
The new law was praised, however, by far right Israel MP Bezalel Smotrich who described the passage of the new law as a “historic day for the settlement movement and for Israel.”
He added: “Today Israel decreed that developing settlement in Judea and Samaria [the West Bank] is an Israeli interest. From here we move on to expanding Israeli sovereignty [on the West Bank] and continuing to build and develop settlements across the land.”



Pinterest
 Netanyahu urges May to support new sanctions against Iran – video

Speaking ahead of the vote, UN envoy for the Middle East peace process, Nickolay Mladenov, warned: “If adopted into law, it will have far-reaching legal consequences for Israel and greatly diminish the prospects for Arab-Israeli peace.”
Netanyahu had blown hot and cold over the legislation – reportedly telling ministers he feared it would lead the country to the dock of the international criminal court.ore
According to comments made by Netanyahu the timing of the late night vote on the bill was coordinated with the Trump administration.
A White House statement last week offered the mildest of criticism of a recent surge in Israeli settlement building announcements. It was read by some as expressing irritation that the Trump administration had not been forewarned of the Israeli plans ahead of a meeting between Trump and Netanyahu next Monday.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/feb/06/israel-likely-pass-bill-retroactively-legalising-jewish-settlements

------------------------------

My Comments

1. When one wanted to explain the so-called Trump  anti-Muslim ban (for Shiit countries), and wonder where the alleged coordination might have taken in -  one could refer to the latest move (to try to legitimise a policy of cleansing "Eretz-Israel" for Jewish use only, which de facto has been applied for the last century or so)  of the acting colonial Jew-supremacist Netanyahu government.

2. Another USA policy by the (paradoxically) combined Jew- and white-supremacist Trump administration to be closely coordinated with the Jew-supremacist Likud government will be the effort to introduce another flavour of regime-change in Iran.

3. The apparent (plans for a) refreshed rapprochement by the new USA government towards the main ally of Iran - Russia - might (apart from trying to isolate newly chosen USA enemy number none, China even further) also be intended, to try to sort out some kind of mutually to be appreciated bargain at this respect.

4. Although I can not see Russia moving too enthusiastically into a scheme, whereby it might lose her justly acquired influence (and it's military bases) in the ME.

5. But then : Just as there will be numerous blistering Russian files on Trump et al. to be conveniently deployed at the right time if necessary, there also will be USA (Mossad) files on Putin and his clique, to prevent Russia from gaining a decisive leverage over Trump.