vrijdag 17 mei 2019

Revealed: air pollution may be damaging 'every organ in the body’




Revealed: air pollution may be damaging 'every organ in the body’
Exclusive: Comprehensive analysis finds harm from head to toe, including dementia, heart and lung disease, fertility problems and reduced intelligence
Fri 17 May 2019 11.00 GMT
Air pollution may be damaging every organ and virtually every cell in the human body, according to a comprehensive new global review.
The research shows head-to-toe harm, from heart and lung disease to diabetes and dementia, and from liver problems and bladder cancer to brittle bones and damaged skin. Fertility, foetuses and children are also affected by toxic air, the review found.
The systemic damage is the result of pollutants causing inflammation that then floods through the body and ultrafine particles being carried around the body by the bloodstream.
Air pollution is a “public health emergency”, according to the World Health Organization, with more than 90% of the global population enduring toxic outdoor air. New analysis indicates 8.8m early deaths each year – double earlier estimates – making air pollution a bigger killer than tobacco smoking.
But the impact of different pollutants on many ailments remains to be established, suggesting well-known heart and lung damage is only “the tip of the iceberg”.
“Air pollution can harm acutely, as well as chronically, potentially affecting every organ in the body,” conclude the scientists from the Forum of International Respiratory Societies in the two review papers, published in the journal Chest. “Ultrafine particles pass through the [lungs], are readily picked up by cells, and carried via the bloodstream to expose virtually all cells in the body.”
Prof Dean Schraufnagel, at the University of Illinois at Chicago and who led the reviews, said: “I wouldn’t be surprised if almost every organ was affected. If something is missing [from the review] it is probably because there was no research yet.”
The review represents “very strong science”, said Dr Maria Neira, WHO director of public and environmental health: “It adds to the very heavy evidence we have already. There are more than 70,000 scientific papers to demonstrate that air pollution is affecting our health.”
She said she expected even more impacts of air pollution to be shown by future research: “Issues like Parkinson’s or autism, for which there is some evidence but maybe not the very strong linkages, that evidence is coming now.”

Chronic laryngitisAsthmaLung cancerHeart disease
StrokeDementiaReduced intelligenceEye problemsSkin ageing
Kidney cancerBladder cancerDiabetesCrohn’s diseaseFatty liver disease
Reduced fertilityMiscarriageLow birthweightInfant health problems

How air pollution reaches every part of the body ...

The WHO has called air pollution the “silent killer” because its widespread effects are often not ascribed to toxic air.

Lungs and heart

The harmful effects of dirty air shown in the review begin when the pollution is inhaled.
This results in breathing problems, from asthma to emphysema to lung cancer. There is now overwhelming evidence that air pollution results in serious harm not only to the lungs, but also to the heart. Here it increases the risk of heart attacks as arteries narrow and muscles weaken.
One reason for the wide-ranging damage from air pollution is that very small particles can penetrate the lungs and be carried around the body. “They land in the organs directly,” Schraufnagel said.
“Animal studies have shown they can even travel right up the olfactory nerve into the brain.” An emerging area of research also suggests air pollution can affect how genes function, he added.

Brain and mind

Strokes, dementia and reduced intelligence are all conditions affecting the brain that have been linked to air pollution.
There is also evidence that poor sleep can be a consequence of breathing toxic air.
The main reason for the far-reaching damage from air pollution is systemic inflammation, said Schraufnagel.
“Immune cells think a [pollution particle] is a bacteria, go after it and try to kill it by releasing enzymes and acids,” he said.
“Those inflammatory proteins spread into the body, affecting the brain, the kidneys, the pancreas and so forth. In evolutionary terms, the body has evolved to defend itself against infections, not pollution.”

Abdominal organs

Among the many other organs affected is the liver. Schraufnagel said the latter surprised him, until he thought about the liver’s role in removing toxins from the body: “It makes perfect sense, but I would not have thought about it before starting the study.”
Research highlighted in the review also links air pollution to numerous cancers, including in the bladder and the gut, where an increase in irritable bowel syndrome has also been found.
Even skin and bones are affected, with skin ageing, hives and brittle bones associated with toxic air.

Reproduction, babies and children

Perhaps the most disturbing impact of toxic air is the damage to reproduction and children. Fertility is reduced and miscarriages increased by exposure to air pollution.
The unborn are also affected, with a recent study finding pollutants in the placentas that nourish foetuses.
Air pollution is also strongly linked to low birthweights for babies, which has lifelong consequences.
Children are especially vulnerable, the review found, as their bodies are still developing.
Exposure to dirty air leads to stunted lungs, increases in childhood obesity, leukemia and mental health problems.
‘Doctors need to speak up’
Schraufnagel is concerned that many doctors are unaware of this wide-ranging damage associated with air pollution.
“Some have no idea air pollution affects the organs they specialise in. But it affects their organs too and they had better pay attention,” he said. “They need to educate their patients and then they should speak up” in favour of action.
Researchers cannot experiment on people and so by necessity many studies show significant associations between poor air quality and disease, but cannot prove cause and effect.
However, Schraufnagel said particularly compelling evidence comes from three types of study: where air pollution and illness change in tandem over time, where the “dose” of pollution correlates with levels of disease and from animal studies.
For example, government action to slash pollution before the Beijing Olympics in 2008 led to a rise in birth weights in the city.
“Harmful effects occur even at levels below air quality standards previously considered to be safe,” warn the review scientists, who between them represent every continent. But they add: “The good news is that the problem of air pollution can be addressed.”
“The best way to reduce exposure is to control it at its source,” said Schraufnagel. Most air pollution comes from burning fossil fuels to generate electricity, heat homes and power transport.
“We need to work on these factors in a very dramatic way,” said Neira. “We are probably the first generation in history to be exposed to such a high level of pollution. People will say that in London or other places it was worse 100 years ago, but now we are talking about an incredible number of people exposed for a long time.”
“We have megacities where all the citizens are breathing toxic air,” she said. “However, with all the tonnes of evidence we are collecting now, politicians will not be able to say we didn’t know.”
DevelopmentGarry Blight
   
AnimationSimon Roberts
 
EditorsLydia Smears and Alan Evans
Photograph: Getty

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/ng-interactive/2019/may/17/air-pollution-may-be-damaging-every-organ-and-cell-in-the-body-finds-global-review

dinsdag 14 mei 2019

How Spy Tech Firms Let Governments See Everything on a Smartphone






How Spy Tech Firms Let Governments See Everything on a Smartphone

There are dozens of digital spying companies that can track everything a target does on a smartphone.CreditSpencer Platt/Getty Images

Image
There are dozens of digital spying companies that can track everything a target does on a smartphone.CreditCreditSpencer Platt/Getty Images
SAN FRANCISCO — Want to invisibly spy on 10 iPhone owners without their knowledge? Gather their every keystroke, sound, message and location? That will cost you $650,000, plus a $500,000 setup fee with an Israeli outfit called the NSO Group. You can spy on more people if you would like — just check out the company’s price list.
The NSO Group is one of a number of companies that sell surveillance tools that can capture all the activity on a smartphone, like a user’s location and personal contacts. These tools can even turn the phone into a secret recording device.
Since its founding six years ago, the NSO Group has kept a low profile. But last month, security researchers caught its spyware trying to gain access to the iPhone of a human rights activist in the United Arab Emirates. They also discovered a second target, a Mexican journalist who wrote about corruption in the Mexican government.
Now, internal NSO Group emails, contracts and commercial proposals obtained by The New York Times offer insight into how companies in this secretive digital surveillance industry operate. The emails and documents were provided by two people who have had dealings with the NSO Group but would not be named for fear of reprisals.

The company is one of dozens of digital spying outfits that track everything a target does on a smartphone. They aggressively market their services to governments and law enforcement agencies around the world. The industry argues that this spying is necessary to track terrorists, kidnappers and drug lords. The NSO Group’s corporate mission statement is “Make the world a safe place.”
Ten people familiar with the company’s sales, who refused to be identified, said that the NSO Group has a strict internal vetting process to determine who it will sell to. An ethics committee made up of employees and external counsel vets potential customers based on human rights rankings set by the World Bank and other global bodies. And to date, these people all said, NSO has yet to be denied an export license.
But critics note that the company’s spyware has also been used to track journalists and human rights activists.
“There’s no check on this,” said Bill Marczak, a senior fellow at the Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto’s Munk School of Global Affairs. “Once NSO’s systems are sold, governments can essentially use them however they want. NSO can say they’re trying to make the world a safer place, but they are also making the world a more surveilled place.”
The NSO Group’s capabilities are in higher demand now that companies like Apple, Facebook and Google are using stronger encryption to protect data in their systems, in the process making it harder for government agencies to track suspects.
The NSO Group’s spyware finds ways around encryption by baiting targets to click unwittingly on texts containing malicious links or by exploiting previously undiscovered software flaws. It was taking advantage of three such flaws in Apple software — since fixed — when it was discovered by researchers last month.
The cyberarms industry typified by the NSO Group operates in a legal gray area, and it is often left to the companies to decide how far they are willing to dig into a target’s personal life and what governments they will do business with. Israel has strict export controls for digital weaponry, but the country has never barred the sale of NSO Group technology.
The founders of NSO Group, Omri Lavie, left, and Shalev Hulio.CreditNSO Group

Image
The founders of NSO Group, Omri Lavie, left, and Shalev Hulio.Credit
NSO Group
Since it is privately held, not much is known about the NSO Group’s finances, but its business is clearly growing. Two years ago, the NSO Group sold a controlling stake in its business to Francisco Partners, a private equity firm based in San Francisco, for $120 million. Nearly a year later, Francisco Partners was exploring a sale of the company for 10 times that amount, according to two people approached by the firm but forbidden to speak about the discussions.
The company’s internal documents detail pitches to countries throughout Europe and multimillion-dollar contracts with Mexico, which paid the NSO Group more than $15 million for three projects over three years, according to internal NSO Group emails dated in 2013.
“Our intelligence systems are subject to Mexico’s relevant legislation and have legal authorization,” Ricardo Alday, a spokesman for the Mexican embassy in Washington, said in an emailed statement. “They are not used against journalists or activists. All contracts with the federal government are done in accordance with the law.”
Zamir Dahbash, an NSO Group spokesman, said that the sale of its spyware was restricted to authorized governments and that it was used solely for criminal and terrorist investigations. He declined to comment on whether the company would cease selling to the U.A.E. and Mexico after last week’s disclosures.
For the last six years, the NSO Group’s main product, a tracking system called Pegasus, has been used by a growing number of government agencies to target a range of smartphones — including iPhones, Androids, and BlackBerry and Symbian systems — without leaving a trace.
Among the Pegasus system’s capabilities, NSO Group contracts assert, are the abilities to extract text messages, contact lists, calendar records, emails, instant messages and GPS locations. One capability that the NSO Group calls “room tap” can gather sounds in and around the room, using the phone’s own microphone.
Pegasus can use the camera to take snapshots or screen grabs. It can deny the phone access to certain websites and applications, and it can grab search histories or anything viewed with the phone’s web browser. And all of the data can be sent back to the agency’s server in real time.
In its commercial proposals, the NSO Group asserts that its tracking software and hardware can install itself in any number of ways, including “over the air stealth installation,” tailored text messages and emails, through public Wi-Fi hot spots rigged to secretly install NSO Group software, or the old-fashioned way, by spies in person.
Much like a traditional software company, the NSO Group prices its surveillance tools by the number of targets, starting with a flat $500,000 installation fee. To spy on 10 iPhone users, NSO charges government agencies $650,000; $650,000 for 10 Android users; $500,000 for five BlackBerry users; or $300,000 for five Symbian users — on top of the setup fee, according to one commercial proposal.
You can pay for more targets. One hundred additional targets will cost $800,000, 50 extra targets cost $500,000, 20 extra will cost $250,000 and 10 extra costs $150,000, according to an NSO Group commercial proposal. There is an annual system maintenance fee of 17 percent of the total price every year thereafter.
What that gets you, NSO Group documents say, is “unlimited access to a target’s mobile devices.” In short, the company says: You can “remotely and covertly collect information about your target’s relationships, location, phone calls, plans and activities — whenever and wherever they are.”
And, its proposal adds, “It leaves no traces whatsoever.”

woensdag 8 mei 2019

Trump’s antics over Iran have endangered us all. The stakes are now lethally high






Trump’s antics over Iran have endangered us all. The stakes are now lethally high

In withdrawing from the nuclear deal, the US – not the vile Iranian regime – is the rogue state risking global security

S
uch is the carnival of the Trump presidency, it can be tempting – especially for those outside the US – to view it as spectacle, a long-running reality TV show that veers between The Apprentice and House of Cards. But every now and then comes a reminder that, for all the cartoonish absurdity of the central character, the Trump administration is all too real, that its actions matter and that the stakes are lethally high.

A fresh and urgent reminder of that has come today with Iran’s declarationthat it will no longer fully comply with the nuclear deal it reached with the US and Europe in 2015, by which Tehran agreed to a 15-year pause on its nuclear programme in return for the easing of economic sanctions. In a televised address this morning – exactly one year after Trump withdrew the United States from the deal – Iran’s president, Hassan Rouhani, announced a series of moves that would inch the country closer to acquiring the ability to produce nuclear weapons, moves that would only be averted if Europe defied Trump and allowed Iran once again to sell its oil and have access to the international banking system. For the most severe of these steps, Rouhani gave the Europeans 60 days to make up their minds: either resume trade or watch Tehran resume its nuclear efforts.







There’s no mystery why this has come about, even if cause and effect are separated by 12 months. On 8 May last year, Trump dismissed the advice of his own military and security chiefs and broke from what he called the “worst deal in history”. The likeliest explanation is that Trump disliked the deal not because it was ineffective – on the contrary, international inspectors were adamant that Iran was complying to the letter – but simply because it represented the single biggest foreign-policy achievement of his predecessor. Just as Trump has been determined to unravel Barack Obama’s healthcare reforms, so he has been bent on dismantling his international legacy. Laughable though it may seem, Trump’s envy and resentment of Obama and his reputation may well be the key driver of this major geopolitical shift.
The consequences have been direct. Fearing secondary sanctions imposed by the US – heavy US fines on any company that does business with Iran – European firms have pulled out of the country, choking an already ailing Iranian economy. That has led Iranians to demand their leaders hit back. The only surprise of today’s move is that it took so long, as Tehran waited a full year to respond to Trump – all the while continuing to obey the terms of the nuclear deal.
Make no mistake, none of this is to suggest Iran is some paragon. The opposite is true. Along with the Kremlin, the Tehran regime is a blood-soaked ally of Bashar al-Assad, shoring up his murderous rule in Syria. It is a prime funder of terror groups in the region. And its record in crushing domestic dissent is brutal and documented. (An Iranian man was hanged for the crime of having gay sex just a few months ago.)
The regime’s behaviour is abhorrent now and it was abhorrent when the nuclear deal was signed. That agreement did not make any false promises of making it better. All it pledged was to halt the country’s nuclear ambitions for the next decade and a half, to buy some time and open up the space for the kind of cooperation that might make change possible. Like it or not, Iran has kept its side of the bargain, which related solely to its nuclear conduct. By withdrawing from it without cause, it was Trump’s Washington, not Tehran, that behaved like a rogue state.







Now the Europeans face a painful dilemma. If they buckle to Trump, they will watch that limited but valuable 2015 agreement collapse. If they defy him, some of their biggest companies will face crippling fines. They have spent much of the last year trying to construct a mechanism to get around those US sanctions, without success. Perhaps now they will approach the task with more urgency, though it’s not as if European governments don’t have plenty on their plates. (This, incidentally, was an issue in which pre-Brexit Britain was centrally engaged: now, it seems, the country is too distracted and too diminished to have much diplomatic impact.)
Either way, what the Europeans and the rest of the world can no longer deny is that Trump’s antics – his resentments, his decisions based on impulse, rather than evidence, his constant gestures to the Fox News base – may play out like gripping TV drama. But they have consequences in the real world, and some of them are grave.
 Jonathan Freedland is a Guardian columnist

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

My Comments :

"Trump’s antics over Iran have endangered us all. The stakes are now lethally high"

1. Well mr. Freedland, if we are allowed to speculate - as you clearly have done at this occasion in your column - about the real reason behind the decision of Trump, to revoke the (renowned by many nations) international treaty with Iran on (willingly temporarily limiting its) atomic development, I would simply put the question to you of WHO exactly will be likely to benefit mostly from this highly toxic decision.

2. The second leading question - which is directly connected and related to the first one -  might be the one that is asking after the exact identity of the special interest groups within the USA, that might give us a clue to the answer on the first question.

3. Let us first and for all conclude that 21-first century Iran is a major player in the Middle Eastern geo-political powerpool and a player that has shown us - by its multiple involvement in a range of recent geo-political developments in the ME for example - that it might have the ambition of becoming the regional superpower.  

4. Parallel to this question we might have to admit to the conclusion, that the position of regional superpower in the ME is tightly knitted to the question, of who might have the most lethal (especially atomic) weaponry within its possession. 

5. So one might be tempted (allowed even) to speculate about those entities in that very same area - including the special interest groups in the USA, that for a century at least, have been highly effectively representing the position of that entity - that might be all too willing to provoke Iran into some sort of reaction, that might give those interest-groups in their turn, some sort of alibi, to finally bomb-bomb-bomb the atomic potential and the political / religious  heart out of Shiite Iran.

6. To bomb the reli-political heart and atomic potential out of Iran after having first removed much of the Iranian economical heart already by way of (re-) imposing crippling economic sanctions of course.

7.  The question of who might benefit from unleashing an all out (conventional) confrontation with Iran, is practically the same exercise as answering the question of who has been screaming for years now, to have Iranian influence in the region diminished once and for all.  

8.  Iran has been attacked in the (fifties (UK-USA) and the) eighties for that very same reason (i.e. to suppress by its rivals, the Iranian ambition of becoming the regional superpower) by the then USA ally / proxy Saddam Hussein, but Iran appeared to be too resilient at the time.

9. The main competitor in the ME - next to Iran and (Sunni) Saudi Arabia that is - that has been applying for the position of regional superpower, is by all means one of the most favoured nations in the ME to Freedland.

10. But when it is all that obvious, who might be the greatest / biggest benefactor from a geo-politically diminished  Iran, why is not (the notorious zionist apologist) Freedland overtly mentioning this circumstance, and in stead trying to let us believe - in full propaganda mode - that the pathological psyche of Trump might mainly be to blame for the decision, to abandon the international Iranian atom-treaty.  

11. Moreover I would like to suggest more specifically to Freedland, that the very reason why the USA revoked the treaty a year ago, might partly have to do with the fact, that the influence of the USA in the world has increasingly been challenged by the rising superpower China, that has shown to the USA, that it is not to humbly bow over, to just any geo-political wishes of the steadily declining super-power USA.

12. So those forces within the USA that are closely connected to the main rival in the ME for becoming regional superpower in the ME, might have been calculating, that the longer the USA will wait with (ultimately militarily) attacking Iran, the more difficult it might be to entertain such an activity after the period of ten years, that the international atomic treaty with Iran has been providing for.  

13. This might also be the very reason why the USA "national security adviser" Bolton a few days ago, (more or less) circumvented the USA secretary of Defense, by (announcing) ordering the Pentagon, to send another USA aircraft-carrier to the Middle East.

14. So we might be in the right position, to speculate on the base of rather well-educated arguments, that within a not too distant point in the future, a new major military conflict might be initiated by the USA - and/or by its proxy Saudi Arabia - against Iran.

15. After all, has this scenario not been altogether foretold in great detail by the former USA Defense secretary Wesley Clark, who informed the world in the first decade of the century about the USA Pentagon contingency plans for reshaping the power-balance in the Middle East, and has not that very "national security adviser" Bolton been central into developing and promoting those very plans at the time.