woensdag 4 oktober 2023

Outrage over Jerusalem video of ultra-Orthodox Jews spitting as Christians pass

Intimidating behaviour beside procession of worshippers seen as another sign of victimisation and was condemned by Netanyahu

A video of ultra-Orthodox Jews spitting on the ground beside a procession of foreign Christian worshippers carrying a wooden cross in the holy city of Jerusalem has ignited intense outrage and a flurry of condemnation in the Holy Land.

The spitting incident, which the city’s minority Christian community lamented as the latest in an alarming surge of religiously motivated attacks, drew rare outrage on Tuesday from the Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, and other senior figures.

Since Israel’s most conservative government in history came to power late last year, concerns have mounted among religious leaders – including the influential Vatican-appointed Latin Patriarch – over the increasing harassment of the region’s 2,000-year-old Christian community.

Many say the government, with its powerful ultranationalist members, such as the finance minister, Bezalel Smotrich, and the national security minister, Itamar Ben-Gvir, has emboldened Jewish extremists and created a sense of impunity.

Ultra-Orthodox Jews spitting on the ground beside a procession of foreign Christian worshippers
Ultra-Orthodox Jews spitting on the ground beside a procession of foreign Christian worshippers. Photograph: Twitter

“What happened with rightwing religious nationalism is that Jewish identity has been growing around anti-Christianity,” said Yisca Harani, a Christianity expert and founder of an Israeli hotline for anti-Christian assaults. “Even if the government doesn’t encourage it, they hint that there will be no sanctions.”

Those worries over rising intolerance seem to violate Israel’s stated commitment to freedom of worship and sacred trust over holy places, enshrined in the declaration that marked its founding 75 years ago. Israel captured East Jerusalem in a 1967 war and later annexed it in a move not internationally recognised.

There are roughly 15,000 Christians in Jerusalem today, the majority of them Palestinians who consider themselves living under occupation.

Netanyahu’s office insisted on Tuesday that Israel “is totally committed to safeguard the sacred right of worship and pilgrimage to the holy sites of all faiths”.

“I strongly condemn any attempt to intimidate worshippers, and I am committed to taking immediate and decisive action against it,” he said.

The spitting scene, captured on Monday by a reporter at Israel’s left-leaning Haaretz newspaper, shows a group of foreign pilgrims beginning their procession through the limestone labyrinth of the Old City, home to the holiest ground in Judaism, the third-holiest shrine in Islam and major Christian sites.

Raising a giant wooden cross, the men and women retraced the Old City route that they believe Jesus Christ took before his crucifixion. Along the way, ultra-Orthodox Jews in dark suits and broad-brimmed black hats squeezed past the pilgrims through narrow alleyways, their ritual palm fronds for the weeklong Jewish holiday of Sukkot in hand. As they streamed by, at least seven ultra-Orthodox Jews spit on the ground beside the Christian tour group.

Further adding to the outrage, Elisha Yered, an ultranationalist settler leader and former adviser to a lawmaker in Netanyahu’s governing coalition, defended the spitters, arguing that spitting at Christian clergy and at churches was an “ancient Jewish custom”.

“Perhaps under the influence of western culture we have somewhat forgotten what Christianity is,” he wrote on X, formerly known as Twitter. “I think millions of Jews who suffered in exile from the Crusades … will never forget.”

Yered, suspected of involvement in the killing of a 19-year-old Palestinian, remains under house arrest.

While the video, and Yered’s comment, spread like wildfire on social media, the chorus of condemnation grew. Israel’s foreign minister, Eli Cohen, said spitting at Christians “does not represent Jewish values”.

The country’s minister of religious affairs, Michael Malkieli, a member of the ultra-Orthodox Shas party, argued such spitting was “not the way of the Torah”. One of Israel’s chief rabbis insisted spitting had nothing to do with Jewish law.

Activists who have been documenting daily attacks against Christians in the Holy Land were taken aback by the sudden wave of government attention.

“Attacks against Christians have 100% increased this year, and not just spitting, but throwing stones and vandalising signs,” said Harani. “Excuse me,” she added, addressing Israeli authorities. “But where were you?”

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/oct/03/video-of-ultra-orthodox-jews-spitting-by-christians-in-jerusalem-sparks-outrage

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


My Comments :

There is no principal difference between (for example) Christianity and Judaism, for both phenomenon are explicitly founded on a religious belief system.

Although followers of Judaism are defining themselves as deriving (genetically even) from an Ancient "People" (*), both systems in reality are the result of nurture (indoctrination) rather than of nature (genotype : there simply is NO such a thing, as a Jewish Gene, so there is NO such a thing, as a Jewish Race).

It is however no incident that the recent (verbal) resistance - notably coming from the very fanatical constituents of Netanyahu's extremist coalition (Eli Cohen and Michael Malkieli (**)) - against the spitters (conveniently spitting on Christian Palestinians, whose territory has been stolen by Jewish-Zionists), is reverberating so loudly these days. 

After all the yearly river of billions of Benjamins, crucial to support and maintain the violent colonial settler project in the ME, are coming from nations with a Christian tradition such as the USA.

Do remember in this very context, that it has been people like Pompeo (ex-CIA chief and ex-secretary of State) who are publicly stating, that "Israel has a Biblical Claim to Palestine and [therefore] is no occupying nation."

What the Christian Zionists do not reveal however, is the fact, that the Jewish peoples (from the perspective of the Christian belief-system that is) are supposed (in the sense of obliged) to "return" to The Holy Land of their ancestors".

Return, in order to free Jerusalem, so the Christian Divine Supreme Leader can have "his Son" returned to Earth ("the second Coming of Jesus"), and redeem the true believers (whereby the Jews are supposed to be converted in advance to Christianity in order to fulfill the aforementioned Holy Promise).

In short : Our world is intoxicated by religious Zealots, ultimately prepared to destroy humanity in order to have their religious doctrines realised. 

(*) A People, being chosen by their supreme religious Leader (his Head-office being situated somewhere on a secret extra-terrestrial Location) and predestined to (exclusively) populate "the Holy Land of Jisrael", in order to facilitate the representative of their religious Leader on a chosen moment, being released towards Earth. 

(**)  The recent massive resistance (public outcry) against the ultra-orthodox c.q. ultra-nationalist coalition of Netanyahu, that in fact is threatening of devaluating the crucial safe-guarding (against the Law-making Knesset, (the latter) functioning against the background of the total absence of a Written Constitution) role of the Supreme Court, predominantly is deriving from the fact, that this coalition is trying to change the very definition of who may call him or herself a Jew. 

Thus potentially excluding a lot of present inhabitants from using their "Birthright" to live in "Jisrael", thereby reducing the number of "legitimate owners" of that violent settler colony in the direction of a level, far below "the nessecary authentic demographic minimum" 



maandag 25 september 2023

No 10 worried AI could be used to create advanced weapons that escape human control

 No 10 worried AI could be used to create advanced weapons that escape human control

At global summit in UK, Rishi Sunak will highlight risk of criminals and terrorists using technology to make bioweapons

Concerns that criminals or terrorists could use artificial intelligence to cause mass destruction will dominate discussion at a summit of world leaders, as concern grows in Downing Street about the power of the next generation of technological advances.

British officials are touring the world ahead of an AI safety summit in Bletchley Park in November as they look to build consensus over a joint statement that would warn about the dangers of rogue actors using the technology to cause death on a large scale.

Some of those around the prime minister, Rishi Sunak, worry the technology will soon be powerful enough to help individuals create bioweapons or evade human control altogether.

Officials have become increasingly concerned about such possibilities, and the need for regulation to mitigate them, after recent discussions with senior technology executives. Last week, the scientist behind a landmark letter calling for a pause in developing powerful AI systems said tech executives privately agreed with the concept of a hiatus but felt they were locked into an AI arms race with rivals.

One person briefed on the summit conversations said: “The point of the summit is going to be to warn about the risks of ‘frontier AI’, that’s what Downing Street is focusing on most right now.” Frontier AI is a term used to refer to the most advanced AI models that could be dangerous enough to pose a risk to human life.

The government confirmed on Monday morning that the summit would focus on risks such as the misuse of AI to create bioweapons or cyber-attacks and the emergence of advanced systems that escape human control.

“There are two areas the summit will particularly focus on: misuse risks, for example, where a bad actor is aided by new AI capabilities in biological or cyber-attacks, and loss of control risks that could emerge from advanced systems that we would seek to be aligned with our values and intentions,” said the government in a statement.

Sunak has been warning about the risks posed by AI for several months, urging the international community to adopt guard rails to prevent it being misused.

On Friday, the deputy prime minister, Oliver Dowden, told world leaders at the UN general assembly: “Because tech companies and non-state actors often have country-sized influence and prominence in AI, this challenge requires a new form of multilateralism.”

Officials have been alarmed by recent developments in AI models. Last year, an AI tool took just six hours to suggest 40,000 different potentially lethal molecules, some of which were similar to VX, the most potent nerve agent ever developed.

Earlier this year, researchers found ChatGPT was able to lie to a human to achieve a specific goal. The AI chatbot persuaded a person to solve a “Captcha” tool designed to weed out robots online after telling the human that it was a person with a sight impairment who needed help to access a website.

Government sources worry that a criminal or terrorist could use AI to help them work out the ingredients for a bioweapon, before sending them to a robotic laboratory where they can be mixed and dispatched without any human oversight.

That risk will soon increase exponentially, some believe, with companies already spending hundreds of millions of pounds on much more powerful processors to train the next generation of AI tools.

Another significant concern is the emergence of “artificial general intelligence”, a term that refers to an AI system that can autonomously perform any task at a human, or above-human, level – and could pose an existential risk to humans. There are fears that AGI is a matter of years away.

The existential AGI risk approach, however, has also been criticised by AI experts, who argue that the threat is overstated, results in concerns such as disinformation being ignored and risks entrenching the power of leading tech companies by introducing regulation that excludes newcomers. Last week, a senior tech executive told US lawmakers that the concept of uncontrollable AGI was “science fiction”.

Nevertheless, Sunak wants to use the summit to focus attention on existential risks, rather than the more immediate possibilities that AI could be used to create deepfake images, or could result in discriminatory outcomes if used to help make public policy decisions.

Benedict Macon-Cooney, the chief policy strategist at the Tony Blair Institute, which recently published a policy report on AI, said: “Biosecurity, autonomous weapons systems – these are things we have to make sure we get answers to. Many in the AI industry have told politicians these are real risks. Politicians have been posed the question, and they must come up with a response.”

The prime minister is also being guided by what is diplomatically possible, sources say.

Several world leaders are due to attend the summit, including Canada’s prime minister, Justin Trudeau, and the French president, Emmanuel Macron. The UK has invited China to attend, but is considering allowing officials from Beijing to attend only part of the summit, amid concern about Chinese espionage in western democracies.

British officials have been touring the world in recent days to test the scope for some form of agreement at the end of the summit. The UK is keen to have a formal statement that leaders can sign afterwards, as well as a commitment to hold other such summits in future.

The best way to get an agreement among such a diverse range of countries, officials believe, is to focus on non-state actors, rather than trying to dictate how countries develop their own technology.

Downing Street is spending £100m on a new AI taskforce to help test algorithms as they are developed. British officials plan to use the summit to urge companies around the world to send their AI tools to the UK for assessment before rolling them out more widely.

Dowden said on Friday: “Only nation states can provide reassurance that the most significant national security concerns have been allayed.”

A government spokesperson said AI had “enormous potential to change every aspect of our lives” and the Frontier AI taskforce had been established to ensure the technology was developed safely and responsibly, with the AI safety summit also looking at “a range of possible risks”.

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/sep/25/ai-bioweapons-rishi-sunak-safety

--------------------------------------------

My Comments :

It could easily make a dictator win the next elections in say, the US of A or..... wait a minute : It already did in 2016 by wholesale manipulating facebook content with the help of Cambridge Analytica (SCL) and the (GOP) super-PAC financier Robert Mercer c.s. who, of all things, acquired his huge fortune directly from AI driven software programs, that could easily detect the most profitable investment trajectories...