woensdag 24 december 2025

‘This is the Costco of energy, man!’: author Bill McKibben on the promise of renewables

 





Climate crisis

‘This is the Costco of energy, man!’: author Bill McKibben on the promise of renewables

Steve Curwood of Living on Earth




The activist and author of Here Comes the Sun discusses rapid advances in solar and wind power and how the US ceded leadership in the sector to its main rival
Bill McKibben’s book The End of Nature, published in 1989, warned early of the dangers of climate changes and he has been campaigning and writing ever since. His most recent book, Here Comes the Sun, takes a look at the soaring potential of renewable energy
Is your latest book a more optimistic take on this world?
Optimism may not be exactly the right word. The things that we were warning about in The End of Nature almost 40 years ago have happened. The planet is now warming fast. The scientists were absolutely right. We face an endless series of disasters that will get worse. This is the main legacy of our moment on Earth so far.
But as of the last three or four years, we finally have a tool, not at this point to stop global warming – it’s too late for that – but perhaps to at least shave some tenths of a degree off how hot the planet gets. And that tool is cheap energy from the sun and the wind and the batteries to store that power when the sun goes down or the wind drops. Alternative energy is the commonsense, obvious, straightforward way to make power on this planet, which is why 95% of new generating capacity around planet Earth last year came from these clean sources.
Bill McKibben in 2014. Photograph: Graeme Robertson/The Guardian
What inspired you to write this book?
Mostly because I felt like I had a scoop. I’m an old journalist at heart. I do this newsletter every week on Substack called The Crucial Years, which, I think because it’s free, has turned into the largest newsletter of its kind around climate and energy and the environment. It means that I get to keep track of all the things that are happening on a weekly basis around the world.
About 36 months ago, if you were paying attention, you couldn’t help but notice this sudden spike beginning. We’d finally hit the steep part of the S curve. All of a sudden there were stories coming in from around the world, especially, it must be said, China, which is providing the leadership here, and which is doing things on an almost inconceivable scale. In May, the Chinese were building three gigawatts of solar panels a day. A gigawatt is the rough equivalent of a big coal-fired power plant. They were putting up one of those out of solar panels every eight hours. This is like building the pyramids or something, the scale at which this is going on.
There are similar stories from many corners of the world, and they just keep coming. In Australia, they’ve built so much solar power that the government has now decided that electricity will be free for all Australians for three hours every afternoon. Human beings for 700,000 years have worked hard to get energy for our lives, if it meant collecting firewood, if it meant paying your electric bill. Now you don’t have to do that any more, at least if you’re in a place that’s had the foresight to build the solar panels and the wind turbines.
Solar panels on homes in Springfield, west of Brisbane, Australia. Photograph: Darren England/AAP
How will a transition to solar power address global inequality and the disparities that exist in the developing world, in parts of our country as well, many of which came to be because of the fossil fuel industry?
As long as you rely on a source of power that’s only available in a few places, the people who control those places will end up with inordinate wealth and power. John D Rockefeller, the first plutocrat, was the first guy to recognise that. His heirs include Vladimir Putin, who’s using his winnings to run a land war in Europe. They include the Koch brothers, our biggest oil and gas refiners and pipeline suppliers, who use their winnings to systematically undermine our democracy. They include the king of Saudi Arabia, who likes to cut up journalists like you and me with saws.
The world on the other side of this is very different, because there’s sun and wind everywhere, for everyone, and it works best toward the equator. So this is perhaps even a way to start rebalancing a little bit of this north-south division. If you’re in the 80% of humanity that lives in countries that have to import fossil fuel, this couldn’t be really better news, because once you’ve paid the money to build your solar panel or your wind turbine, then you no longer have to come up with American money to buy the next tankerload full of oil.
Pakistanis, mostly working by themselves, without government help, have put up so many solar panels in the last few years that the Pakistani government last month cancelled the delivery of 27 huge cargoloads full of liquefied natural gas from Qatar. They had to pay a penalty, but it was cheaper to pay the penalty than to import this gas that they didn’t need any more because now they’ve got lots of solar panels.
So we have enough money on the planet to make the transition that’s required to really put the brakes on this advance towards climate disruption. What’s keeping folks from providing the resources for poor fossil fuel-trapped countries from making the full transition right away?
To some degree, it’s really starting to happen, and it’s happening with Chinese financing and Chinese technology. The Chinese exported half again as much worth of green tech last year as America did of oil and gas. The force that’s slowing down all of this, of course, is the fossil fuel industry, which understands this good news for everybody else as the worst possible news for its future prospects, and they have trillions of dollars’ worth of hydrocarbons in the ground at today’s market prices that they would like to get out and sell for trillions of dollars, which they won’t be able to do if we’re busily converting to sun, wind, to EVs and heat pumps. So they’re doing everything they possibly can to stop that transition.
Workers unload solar panels from a truck at a market in Rawalpindi, Pakistan. Photograph: Farooq Naeem/AFP/Getty Images
In our country, where their work is the most advanced, that meant when Donald Trump asked them for a billion dollars in campaign donations last year, they came up with about half a billion in donations and advertising and lobbying in the last election cycle, and that was enough to convince the president to shut down windfarms off the coast of New England that were 80% complete, or put the kibosh on a huge solar farm in Nevada that by itself would have powered 2m homes, more than 1% of American homes. We can’t have this stuff that the rest of the world is busily building because our oil and gas industry has corrupted our president – not that that was a very hard task – and so now we get to pretend that climate change isn’t real, that green energy doesn’t work and that we’re somehow all going to go back and inhabit the 1950s again.
Why is it that people are acting this stupid? Let’s be blunt.
All transitions are hard and they involve change, and our species doesn’t deal particularly well with change. And in this case, we’ve had 35 years of a full-on disinformation campaign from the fossil fuel industry about climate change, about alternative energy, all designed to drive home the idea that only the way that we’re doing things now could possibly work. And that’s sunk in with too many people, especially in this country, but the rest of the world is quickly shaking off that habit.
You could tell watching the climate talks this year in Belém, Brazil, that people are sort of moving past the US, like we’re sort of receding into the rearview mirror. It’s becoming clearer and clearer where the future lies.
As patriotic Americans, that should upset us. These technologies were all invented in the US. The first solar cell in 1954 at Bell Labs in New Jersey. The first industrial wind turbine in 1941 at Grandpa’s Knob in Vermont. We could have owned these technologies, and instead we’ve just ceded them to our theoretical main rival on this planet. I don’t think there’s been an act of national self-sabotage quite like this that I can think of anywhere in human history.
Here Comes the Sun is a handbook for people who are trying to wrap their heads around this notion that “hey, it really does make a lot of sense to make the transition away from fossil fuel and will be better for us”. It’s not just, I think you use the term, the Whole Foods of energy, that so-called alternative energy. No, this is the main game.
This is the Costco of energy, man – cheap, available in bulk, on the shelf, ready to go.
How is this book doing? To what extent are people grabbing this and saying: “Oh, my goodness, this really is possible to make a change?”
It’s doing well. It’s been fun. We use it as a kind of organising vehicle for this thing in September that we called Sun Day – not Earth Day, but Sun Day. We had 500 events across the country; people are waking up, and I think that they’ll wake up more as the next year goes on.
My guess is that one of the two or three key issues for the midterm elections, on which all attention will be focused, are going to be electricity prices, which are soaring, as you would expect, because we’re permitting every datacentre that anyone could ever want to build at exactly the same moment that we’re constricting the supply of sun and wind. You don’t need to be a Nobel prize-winning economist to know that when you increase demand and decrease supply, prices are going to rise, and that’s exactly what’s happening.
Anything you want to add to our discussion?
We’ve talked about the economic necessity of doing this and the climate urgency of doing this, but there’s also just a certain amount of beauty that comes with it. When we were getting ready to do Sun Day, one of the things we did was make a playlist of all the songs about the sun. Obviously, I stole the title of my book from George Harrison; Here Comes the Sun is the most listened-to Beatles song on the world’s streaming services. There were hundreds of songs to choose from, which, by the way, is hundreds more than if you tried to compile a playlist of great songs about fracking.
The reason is that humans have a deep, deep connection to the sun. We don’t really know how prehistoric people thought, but all the piles of stone they left behind, like Stonehenge, point towards the equinox or the solstice. As soon as people were in the business of making myths, the first thing they had to explain was how the sun rose over here, set over here.
Sunrise at Stonehenge on the winter solstice, 21 December 2025. Photograph: Finnbarr Webster/Getty Images
I was in Rome in September with the new pope, who had summoned people for a conference on the 10th anniversary of Pope Francis’s epic encyclical on global warming. The new pope said: “Yes, we’re going to continue this work that Francis set us on. In fact, next year, the Vatican will become the first fully solar-powered nation on Earth, when they flip the switch on this big new solar farm they’re finishing up outside Rome.”
When it was my turn for my remarks, I just said: “I think this is fantastic. Let’s henceforth concentrate on energy from heaven, not from hell.” I think that’s a useful mantra for the period ahead.
This article originally appeared on Inside Climate News, a nonprofit, non-partisan news organisation that covers climate, energy and the environment, in collaboration with Living on Earth, an environmental news magazine distributed by the Public Radio Exchange. Sign up for the newsletter here.

The New York Times ignores an essential part of the Jeffrey Epstein story — Israel

 




The New York Times ignores an essential part of the Jeffrey Epstein story — Israel

The New York Times has published a major exposé purporting to explain how Jeffrey Epstein rose to the top of the financial and political world, but it ignores one key topic: Israel.

If you want to understand why conspiracy theories about Jeffrey Epstein flourish, then you must read the interminable investigation the New York Times published, purporting to explain how Jeffrey Epstein clawed himself to the pinnacle of the financial/political/social world. “The Untold Story of How Jeffrey Epstein Got Rich” concludes that Epstein was the greatest conman and swindler that ever lived, and charmed the pants off of every powerful man he met. Some of his marks still curse Epstein for fleecing them. But the paradigm of the article is the execs at Bear Stearns back in the 70s who found out that the former math teacher at Dalton School had invented college degrees from “two California universities” but didn’t fire him because they wanted to give a humble kid from the outer boros a second chance. 

“You lied about your education,” [senior exec Michael] Tennenbaum said.

“Yes, I know,” Epstein calmly replied. He had never graduated from college. Tennenbaum recalls being disarmed by the admission. Decades later, he would regard it as an example of Epstein’s ability to manipulate his marks — in this case, him.

“Why did you do it?” Tennenbaum stammered.

Without an impressive degree or two, Epstein said, “I knew nobody would give me a chance.”

This resonated with Tennenbaum.

That’s a great story, and there is great reporting in this article. But the premise of the article is a stupid myth the NYT wants to believe– That Epstein was just the canniest, boldest con man that ever lived, and he left everybody swooning. The talented Mr Ripley. 

It’s a myth not because Epstein was not a bold and crafty con man – no doubt he was. But even a conman can have an ethos. Look at Gatsby, a mobster with romance. Look at Trump’s fascistic populism. And Jeffrey Epstein had an ethos that he played on over and over again as his racket grew; and that ethos was the love of Israel in the rising Jewish meritocratic establishment of the 70s. 

Almost every player in the Times story is a Jewish success story who lobbied for Israel in prestigious circles, from Dershowitz to Larry Summers, Leon Black, Lynn Forester de Rothschild, and Epstein’s most famous associations, Robert Maxwell and Les Wexner.  

Love of Israel was a lead criterion for inclusion in Epstein’s circle. I don’t think Epstein’s “marks” were even fooled by him. They knew he was a conman who played fast and loose. But they also knew that the Israel lobby has a need for charmers who break the rules, so they looked the other way.   

Epstein did numerous chores for Israel that investigative sites have documented and the Times does not touch: he helped Israel broker financial deals with neighbors, he had an Israeli spy living in his house for a time, and he had a close relationship with former Israeli PM Ehud Barak that included business ventures and politics in Israel.

“It’s well past time to ask questions about the billionaire pedophile’s links to Israel,” Jacobin says

Epstein held multiple passports, including one from Austria with a false name and an address in Saudi Arabia.  

Some theorize that Epstein was Mossad and running a “honeytrap” for the Israeli government, videotaping pols having sex so they could be blackmailed to support Israel. I don’t see the evidence for this. However, the evidence in plain sight suggests that Epstein was always willing to help Israel whenever possible, and this service ultimately elevated him. 

As the Times says, in its one reference to Israel: “In 1989, Epstein accompanied Wayne Owens, a Democratic congressman from Utah, on a trip to the Middle East to explore ways to promote business ties between Israel and its neighbors.” That trip came about because of Epstein’s relationship to the Israel-supporter Les Wexner. But the Times studiously avoids the Israel connection when it comes to the two people Epstein was closest to, businessman Wexner and fellow child sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell. 

To show you how foolish the Times narrative is, let’s focus on those relationships.  

Maxwell says she met Epstein in 1990 or 1991 when she was 30 and had come to New York from England as an ambassador for her beloved father’s growing media empire in the States. A friend introduced her, she says, and she remembers Epstein, then in his late 30s, having a ketchup stain on his tie.  

Maxwell’s father then vetted Epstein by calling Bear Stearns execs. Here’s the Times version: 

“When the domineering Robert Maxwell learned that his daughter was spending time with Epstein, he contacted Ace Greenberg and Jimmy Cayne, both of whom he was close to, to see what they knew about their former Bear Stearns employee. Greenberg and Cayne apparently vouched for Epstein.”

Ghislaine explained the vetting in her deposition to the Justice Department last summer. Her father was extremely protective of her because he was such a controversial figure that she had been threatened, including a death threat by the Irish Republican Army. So he wanted to get her a bodyguard (she turned him down) and to know who she was dating. And Bear Stearns was “one of our banks.”  

Let’s take Ghislaine at her word…

What doesn’t track in the Times story is the idea that Cayne and Greenberg would “vouch” for Epstein. Wait a second. The Times just recounted one incident after another in Epstein’s career in his 20s and 30s where he ripped people off, lied to them, smiles and waves. Cayne and Greenberg knew this well. They’d fired Epstein after an SEC investigation of trading violations 10 years earlier! They knew Epstein to be a charming fraud who invented his degrees. 

So when their friend and client Robert Maxwell, who is one of the biggest businessmen in the world, calls them to get their take on Epstein as boyfriend material for his beloved daughter — they “vouch” for him. No red flags?? 

I think the truth is that everybody knew this guy was a conman, and Ghislaine wasn’t really his girlfriend, but a consort; it was a business relationship from the start (she claims he was actually dating Eva Andersson until 1994). And in fact, the Bear Stearns execs were vouching for Epstein as a Jewish kid on the make who loved what Robert Maxwell loved — Israel. 

Robert Maxwell was born in Czechoslovakia and lost much of his family in the Holocaust. As Ghislaine Maxwell stated in her deposition to the Justice Department last summer, her father served as an intelligence officer in World War II and essentially functioned as one throughout his life, passing on secrets to governments, including Israel. There is speculation that Maxwell worked for Mossad. After his death by drowning in 1991, Maxwell was given what the press termed a state funeral in Israel, and then was buried in Jerusalem. 

“My father, you know, anything that touches on Israel or the state of Israel, I’m always interested in because my father loved Israel and so I pay attention to it and we have ties to Israel,” Maxwell said.  

Jimmy Cayne also loved Israel; he gave to many causes there. Ace Greenberg gave half his philanthropy to Jewish causes and Israel.

The Times also whitewashes the relationship with Les Wexner, the man who truly elevated Epstein. This is how the Times subtitles their association: “A confidence man meets his most significant mark”

So Les Wexner is a mark? But according to the Times, Wexner’s people saw through Epstein from the start. And Wexner just “didn’t listen” again and again. 

[Harold] Levin told us that he spent an hour with Epstein in his office and immediately got a bad vibe. He found a pay phone and called Wexner. “I smell a rat,” Levin reported. “I don’t trust him.”

Wexner apparently didn’t listen…

Almost immediately, Wexner’s colleagues grew alarmed by his embrace of Epstein. “I tried to find out how did he get from a high school math teacher to a private investment adviser,” the vice chairman of the Limited told The New York Times in 2019….

Once again, Wexner didn’t listen, and thus became the most important contributor to the staggering growth in Epstein’s fortune. One unsolved mystery of the Epstein era is what exactly Wexner got out of their relationship.

Wexner didn’t listen because he didn’t want to listen. As to what he got out of the relationship—well, Wexner cares deeply about Israel. Wexner is married to an Israeli-American, Abigail Koppel, whose father fought in Israel’s foundational war and later opened El Al Airlines in the U.S. Per the latest emails, Koppel and Epstein were close. When her father died in 2006—“In lieu of flowers, the family requests that contributions be made to ‘Friends of the Israel Defense Forces,’”

Wexner is a pillar of the Israel lobby. Just last month at the Jewish Federations conference, Eric Fingerhut, a former Congress member, hailed Wexner as one of those great Jewish leaders who love Israel and combine communal leadership with the ability to stand next to the governor and the mayor. 

Yes, and right after he got in with Wexner, Epstein flew out to Israel with a Utah congressman to promote business deals. 

Once you start connecting Israel dots with Epstein, you can’t stop…. Epstein worked with Dershowitz to try to discredit the authors of the bombshell Israel lobby paper in 2006. 

Epstein’s close associate Leon Black (who was brought down by their association in 2021) gave $1 million to the Birthright program and a large gift to the Israeli defense forces. 

The one time I met Epstein (reporting for this article) he was with Howard Rubenstein, the p.r. guy who was a devoted supporter of Israel. 

You simply cannot separate the shared love of Israel from Epstein’s mysterious rise. The Times investigation is naïve and stupid. No wonder people turn to Tucker Carlson.