woensdag 24 juni 2026

Israel’s Suicidal Rupture with the U.S.

 



Israel’s Suicidal Rupture with the U.S.

 June 23, 2026
When Jewish Upon a Star – by Mr. Fish

Israel is turning on its last important ally in an act of suicidal hubris.

Chris Hedges ScheerPost

Israel is sabotaging the negotiations with Iran and alienating its last important ally by refusing to halt its attacks on Lebanon and withdraw from its occupation of the south. It is determined to reignite a regional conflagration that could see Iran perpetually close the Strait of Hormuz and plunge the global economy into a global depression. And it continues its genocide in Gaza.

Israel is contaminated by racism and genocidal violence. It is blinded by a repugnant moral superiority. It is corrupted by a class of Zionist billionaires in the U.S. who use their wealth to bend foreign policy to serve Israeli interests. It is equipped with a nuclear arsenal Israeli officials have repeatedly threatened to use.

It is a menace to the region. It is a menace to itself. And it is a menace to us.

The first round of a quadrilateral meeting between the United States, Iran and Pakistani and Qatari mediators in Switzerland on Sunday — where the Iranian delegation refused to take part in a planned handshake and joint photo with its U.S. counterparts — focused on the U.S. implementing commitments set in the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) for a preliminary 60-day period.

But the closure of the Strait of Hormuz — following Israeli attacks on Lebanon — disrupted the talks. The closure sent Trump into another one of his habitual tantrums, when he reportedly told “Fox News” correspondent Trey Yingst he had informed Iranian negotiators if the Strait of Hormuz remains closed, “[Y]ou won’t even make it back to your fucking country.”

When told that Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian continues to assert Iran’s right to enrich uranium — a right guaranteed by the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons which the U.S. co-founded — Trump reportedly said “[President Pezeshkian] better watch his mouth. He better shape up or we’ll take over the rest of the country.”

“Iran must immediately stop their highly paid PROXIES in Lebanon from causing trouble,” Trump added in a post on Truth Social, referring to Hezbollah. “If they don’t, we’ll hit Iran very hard again, just like we did last week, only harder!!!”

Trump’s threats prompted the Iranian delegation to depart the Swiss venue, while Ghalibaf dismissed Trump’s tirades in a post on X. “Don’t they ever stop to think that if their threats had worked, they wouldn’t have reached today’s desperation? We give the Americans’ threats no weight whatsoever,” he said.

The meeting concluded with “agreeing on a 60-day roadmap toward a final agreement and establishing mechanisms to advance technical negotiations” under the MoU, according to IRNA News Agency.

Israel’s vision of a “Greater Israel,” designed to ensure Israel’s military dominance throughout the Middle East, depends on harnessing the wealth and military power of the U.S.

Over two-thirds of the major arms and munitions Israel imports — without which it could not carry out its genocide of the Palestinians, turn southern Lebanon into a moonscape and bomb Iran, Syria and Qatar — are manufactured and provided by the U.S. And because the Israel lobby, for decades, has owned Congress, because its Zionists allies police and control the media, because it is able to siphon tens of billions of U.S. taxpayer dollars to sustain its military adventurism, Israel is blind to its own limitations. It is willing to inflict harm on its allies, including the U.S., in service to itself.

And that is what it now intends to do. Even the obtuse administration of Donald Trump — which has spent over $34 billion on the war with Iran and which WarCosts estimates at over $214 billion when wider economic costs are factored in — has figured this out.

Israel is apoplectic about the MoU, which was signed virtually on Wednesday, that leaves the disposition of Iranian stockpiled enriched nuclear materials to later negotiations, lifts the U.S. naval blockade, releases frozen Iranian assets and issues waivers to allow Iranian oil sales.

The MoU declares an “immediate and permanent termination of military operations on all fronts.” It proposes a 60-day negotiation period before reaching a final deal, a $300 billion Reconstruction and Development Fund, the withdrawal of U.S. forces from Iran’s periphery and the termination of all international and unilateral sanctions.

The rhetoric unleashed by Israeli politicians and pundits about Trump and those in his administration over the MoU — reportedly arranged without Israeli participation — is venomous. No one in the Trump administration is immune. Trump’s hapless special envoys and unapologetic Zionist assets, Steve Witkoff and his son-in-law Jared Kushner, were castigated as “two little Jews” by Yinon Magal, a former Knesset member-turned-pundit who is close to Benjamin Netanyahu. Trump is a “loser.” Vice President JD Vance is “scum.” “Israel Hayom” — the Israeli newspaper owned by billionaire Miriam Adelson, one of Trump’s biggest financial donors — in an op-ed accused Trump of betraying Israel.

“If I was in the cabinet of the Israeli government, I might not be attacking the only powerful ally that I have anywhere left in the entire world,” Vance retorted.

It is more than ironic that Israel would push Trump — who gives the word bribery a bad name — into opposing Israel. But Israel has overplayed its hand. The Arab and Muslim world and the Global South detests Washington for its backing of the genocide and betrayal of the Palestinians. Israel and its Zionist supporters goaded the U.S. into made-for-Israel wars in Iraq, Libya, Syria and then, another war with Iran. The alliance and military debacles have turned Israel and the U.S. into pariah states.

Now, Israel is turning on the only ally it has left.

The failure by the U.S. to continue to subjugate its interests to those of Israel, even at the cost of economic suicide, is, in the eyes of entitled Zionists, unforgiveable. Israel expects the Zionist billionaire class and the Israel lobby in the U.S., as in the past, to bend to its will.

The Obama White House signed a Memorandum of Understanding in 2016 with Israel pledging $3.8 billion per year in military aid from 2019-2028. Congress authorized an additional $17.9 billion in military aid to Israel to sustain the genocide.

Between 1946 and 2024, the U.S. is estimated to have provided Israel with over $300 billion in military and economic assistance, adjusted for inflation.

The cost of the U.S. wars in Iraq and Afghanistan alone are estimated, by Brown University, to be between $4 to $6 trillion, with much of that to be paid in the coming decades in the form of medical and disability payments to war veterans and their families.

This time the price is too high.

The defeat of Israel and the U.S. in the war on Iran has dealt a mortal blow to the project of “Greater Israel” and the Abraham Accords. It has crippled the Trump presidency, driving up inflation, plunging Trump’s approval rating to dismal levels, paralyzing the economies of Gulf allies and threatening Republican control of the House and the Senate in the November elections.

Israel has no intention of catering to Trump. It could not care less what happens to him, his administration or the effects of the looming economic catastrophe. But Trump, who always has been and always will be out for Trump alone, is not going to sacrifice himself for someone else’s benefit or airy ideals.

Israeli leaders are so out of touch with reality they are threatening to go to war with Iran without the U.S. Avigdor Lieberman, the former defense minister and current leader of the far-right Yisrael Beiteinu party, has called for Israel to build a ballistic missile force and said that if he was in charge, he would direct the Mossad to overthrow the Iranian government.

Israel has no intention of leaving southern Lebanon, the Golan Heights — and other areas of Syria it began occupying following the overthrow of Assad — Gaza — where it occupies 70 percent of the land — or halting its savage ethnic cleansing in the West Bank. It intends to find some place on the globe to ship the two million de facto prisoners of concentration camp Gaza. Palestinians in Gaza are still being slaughtered — over 1,000 have been killed by Israel since the supposed ceasefire went into effect last October — and huddle in overcrowded tent cities without adequate food, clean water or medical care.

These goals may be achievable in the short term, but in the long term they signal the demise of the Zionist state. Democrats are increasingly shedding the albatross of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), which endorsed more than 100 Republicans who voted against certifying the results of the 2020 presidential election. “America First” Republicans and the right wing are retreating into their traditional antisemitism.

The genocide ripped the veil off Israel and exposed its dark and murderous visage to the global community. The war on Iran, which Netanyahu sold as an easy win, exposed Israel’s cynical manipulation of the U.S. to the Trump White House.

Israelis, intoxicated by the fantasy of being the chosen people, do not have friends. They do not have allies. They have those they use and those they slaughter.

“No more insane aid with no conditions, but a condition attached to every dollar and every missile,” the Israeli journalist Gideon Levy writes.

Behave or pay the price. You can no longer do as you please: assassinate, abuse, violate national sovereignty and international law with impunity. In such an atmosphere, Israel will no longer be able to continue to thumb its nose at the international community, for which there is no more unifying issue than opposition to the occupation.

Whether it wants to or not, Israel will have to take this into consideration. The first cracks have already appeared, and how: a deal made with Iran while entirely disregarding Israel, which for years disregarded the United States and the entire world. This is only the beginning: A world that was horrified by what Israel did in the Gaza Strip will want a reckoning. A genocidal state can no longer be the darling of the Western world. A state whose citizens carry out pogroms daily, with the cooperation of its military, will not be a part of the family of nations. The dream is starting to come true. It will be a nightmare.

The game is up. The Israeli domination of the U.S. political system is coming to an end. Israel’s inability to read U.S. and global opinion — or its own population, where over 90 percent believe Israel lost its war against Iran — along with its stubborn belief that its old levers of power can still work, illustrate a leadership that has rendered itself deaf, dumb and blind. It can and will do a lot of damage. It can and will inflict more death and suffering. But it is cannibalizing itself.

NOTE TO SCHEERPOST READERS FROM CHRIS HEDGES: There is now no way left for me to continue to write a weekly column for ScheerPost and produce my weekly television show without your help. The walls are closing in, with startling rapidity, on independent journalism, with the elites, including the Democratic Party elites, clamoring for more and more censorship. Bob Scheer, who runs ScheerPost on a shoestring budget, and I will not waver in our commitment to independent and honest journalism, and we will never put ScheerPost behind a paywall, charge a subscription for it, sell your data or accept advertising. Please, if you can, sign up at chrishedges.substack.com so I can continue to post my now weekly Monday column on ScheerPost and produce my weekly television show, The Chris Hedges Report.

Chris Hedges is a Pulitzer-prize winning journalist, best-selling author & activist.

https://scheerpost.com/2026/06/23/israels-suicidal-rupture-with-the-u-s/

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



My Comments

Make no mistake : The Zionists in the direct aftermath of WWII were very close to decapitate the USA commander in Chief and President of the USA Truman.

Their means of operation then : Send in double enveloped letter bombs tot the White House, in the hope, that the safety checks might only restrict itself to the first envelope and leaf the bomb letter unchecked, so the president might open it and being killed or seriously wounded as a result.

Truman got the message and recognized the settler colonial enterprise as the Jewish state that it always had meant to be from Herzl onwards (remember his publication called " Der Judenstaat)

The same procedure had been planned to convince the UK leadership into accepting the Zionist settler colonial endeavour as "a fact on the ground".

After all, the terrorist organisations of Begin and Shamir had place a assassination squad in London, in order to liquidate the heralded war leader Churchill, if he would fail to come out on the world stage in favour of "Israel".

The same Likudniks did decapitate the Iranian regime a few months ago, with expectation in the back of their mind, that this would mean unconditional surrender to the Zionist settler state's demands.

However, they have been proven excessively wrong, because the Iranian regime had been emergency and contingency planning for this kind of fatal tactics long before it even had been contemplated.

The Iranian regime - for the moment at least - seems to have been "the winner" in the recent vicious attack war by "Israel" end the USA.

Following the inherent rationale of this evenly extremist as cynical Jewsupremacist modus operandi, one might expect, that the decapitation – in whatever way : literally or politically - of the Trump-Vance power-couple might be close at hand right now.

dinsdag 23 juni 2026

Hard-right figures take aim at Ed Miliband and UK net zero policies at ‘anti-woke Davos’

 




Hard-right figures take aim at Ed Miliband and UK net zero policies at ‘anti-woke Davos’

Conservative party leader Kemi Badenoch told Tory peer Philippa Stroud that Ed Miliband had made this country poorer. Photograph: Jordan Pettitt/PA

Kemi Badenoch, who joined US anti-abortion activists and European far-right parties at ARC, described energy secretary as a ‘villain’

Britain’s net zero policies and the energy secretary, Ed Miliband, have come under fire at a conference of conservatives, rightwing populists and wealthy US backers linked to Donald Trump.

The energy policies pursued by the British government were described as a “tragic mistake” by Trump’s energy secretary, one of a number of officials from the US administration attending the event.

More than 4,000 delegates from 85 countries – ranging from the Conservative leader, Kemi Badenoch, through to US anti-abortion activists and representatives of European far-right parties – are attending this year’s Alliance for Responsible Citizenship (ARC) conference in London.

Dubbed by some as an “anti-woke Davos,” themes being championed from the stage at the Olympia conference centre included libertarian hostility to green economic policies, social conservative causes such as opposition to abortion and also opposition to multiculturalism.

Speakers later this week include US state department officials who have sought to interfere in Britain’s abortion rights and debate around online safety regulations, while the Reform leader, Nigel Farage, will address the conference on Wednesday.

One of the key figures on Tuesday was Chris Wright, a former fossil fuel executive who was appointed by Trump as energy secretary. He described energy policies in Britain as a “tragic mistake” that had impoverished citizens.

Wright, who believes the threat from the climate crisis is exaggerated, predicted that a “change of leadership” in the UK would radically reverse energy policy and align it more with the US.

“Most of the major European countries are well aware of the energy mistake they have made and are trying to understand how they are going to pivot away from it,” said Wright, who joined the conference on one of the hottest days of the year in Britain as delegates inside sweltered.

Badenoch and other speakers at the event – which is being funded by a host of US fossil fuel interests, major Trump donors and anti-abortion groups – repeatedly hit out at the energy secretary, Ed Miliband, a villain for many at the conference.

Miliband, who has long been a hate figure for hard-right activists as the face of Britain’s net zero policies, has become the focus of increasing criticism on the right in recent weeks as he was mooted as a possible chancellor in a government led by Andy Burnham.

Speaking to Philippa Stroud, a Tory peer who was one of the co-founders of the ARC conference along with the Canadian psychologist Jordan Peterson, Badenoch said that there had been a “villain in Britain’s deindustrialisation.”

“His name is Ed Miliband and he has made our country poorer,” she said, to applause.

Ed Miliband came under fire at the ARC conference, which funded by a host of US fossil fuel interests. Photograph: Wiktor Szymanowicz/Future Publishing/Getty Images

“We need to make sure that this man should not be let anywhere near the levers of power, not the energy department or anywhere else.”

While ARC is also heavily backed by the owners of GB News – hedge fund manager Paul Marshall and the Dubai-based investment group Legatum – a list of donors for this year’s conference shows that it has received financial backing from powerful US donors with close ties to the Trump administration.

Analysis by the climate investigations outlet DeSmog found that the donors include Anthony Pratt, an Australian-born billionaire who reportedly donated $14m to the Trump-supporting Make America Great Again Super Pac, and a further $1.1m to the president’s inaugural fund.

He is joined on the donors list by the American fossil fuel companies Howard Energy Partners (HEP) and Heyco Energy Group, both of which also helped to fund last year’s event. HEP is one of the largest energy infrastructure companies in the US; its CEO Mike Howard, a Republican donor, was appointed to Trump’s National Petroleum Council in February this year.

Aside from hostility to conventional narratives around the climate crisis, the event has also drawn together thousands of political activists and politicians from across Europe, the US and Australia who are hostile to immigration and multiculturalism.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2026/jun/23/populist-and-rightwing-figures-take-aim-at-ed-miliband-and-uk-net-zero-policies-at-anti-woke-davos

donderdag 18 juni 2026

Antisemitisme als wapen tegen moslims en links

 



Antisemitisme als wapen tegen moslims en links

Judeonationalisme zal niet de laatste strategie zijn om kwetsbare groepen tegen elkaar uit te spelen als wapen tegen moslims en links.

Begin maart 2024 schreef ik in Binnenlands Bestuur het artikel ''Judeonationalisme' als nieuwe beschavingsretoriek’, waarbij politici en andere invloedrijke personen antisemitisme gebruiken als wapen tegen moslims.

Sinds ik het woord als eerste gebruikte, nam het een vlucht: het werd besproken in de Groene Amsterdammer, de Volkskrant, GeenStijl, het was Woord van de Dag op Van Dale.nl en daarmee opgenomen in de Nederlandse Taalbank. Ik werd geïnterviewd bij NPO Radio 1 om meer uitleg te geven over het Judeonationalisme en schreef erover voor de European Consortium for Political Research.

Judeonationalisme definieer ik als het instrumentele gebruik van antisemitisme om moslims en hun standpunten in diskrediet te brengen. De laatste maanden werd deze tactiek gebruikt door bijvoorbeeld Rishi Sunak, Joe Biden, Mark Rutte, Lee Anderson, Donald Trump, Geert Wilders en Mona Keijzer. Dit soort instrumentalisering van antisemitisme komt niet uit de lucht vallen. Afgelopen maandag (24 juni 2024) publiceerde de Britse krant the Guardian bewijs dat er sinds november 2023 extra geld vanuit Israël wordt geïnvesteerd in het beïnvloeden van de publieke debatten over de oorlog in Gaza. Antisemitisme, maar ook vrouwen- en homorechten, worden geïnstrumentaliseerd ‘in een strijd tegen een miljard moslims en alle linkse mensen in de westerse wereld’, zoals werd gezegd door een van de ontvangers van pr-geld vanuit Israël. Een wapen tegen moslims en links, twee vliegen in een klap dus.

In mijn eerder gepubliceerde artikel in Binnenlands Bestuur trek ik de vergelijking met femo- en homonationalisme. Het femonationalisme is het instrumentele gebruik van gendergelijkheid om moslims in diskrediet te brengen, een strategie die al decennia wordt gebruikt, bijvoorbeeld om de invasie in Afghanistan in 2001 goed te praten. Homonationalisme is het instrumentele gebruik van homorechten om moslims in diskrediet te brengen. Dit heeft wortels in Nederland in de tijd van Pim Fortuyn, maar in de laatste tien jaar wordt het in steeds meer landen, zoals het Verenigd Koninkrijk, Spanje en de Verenigde Staten, gebruikt.

De argumentatie is steeds: wij zijn tegen moslims omdat zij tegen vrouwen, homo’s en, zoals we steeds vaker horen, joden zijn. Dit is een succesvolle strategie, omdat het inderdaad waar is dat moslims negatiever zijn over vrouwen, homo’s en joden. Het is mogelijk dat zorgen over deze drie groepen oprecht zijn, maar er is nu ook bewijs dat het instrumenteel is ingezet. Ik ben namelijk niet de enige die het verband ziet tussen moslims enerzijds en gendergelijkheid, homorechten, en antisemitisme anderzijds. Het Israëlische ministerie van ‘Strategische Zaken’ zet zich al jaren in voor ‘mass consciousness activities’ door grote bedragen over te maken aan pr-bedrijven in westerse landen, bijvoorbeeld het Amerikaanse Institute for the Study of Global Antisemitism and Policy, geleid door dr. Charles Small.

Nu de oorlog in Gaza voortduurt, blijken Judeonationalistische strategieën zich bij de femo- en homonationalistische repertoires aan te sluiten

Dit commerciële pr-bureau ontvangt het grootste deel van het budget van het Israëlische ministerie van ‘Strategische Zaken’ om de publieke opinie over Israël te beïnvloeden. Dr. Small noemt het verband tussen moslims enerzijds en gendergelijkheid, homorechten, en antisemitisme anderszijds een soort intersectionaliteit. Hij zegt: ‘intersectionaliteit is zowaar een concept dat we kunnen gebruiken’. Hij noemt het ‘tai chi’ tegen zowel moslims als links, want de beredenering is als volgt: de politieke islam ‘wil joden vermoorden, vrouwen onderdrukken en alle homo’s vermoorden’. Het is, bij mijn weten, de eerste keer dat een pr-bureau toegeeft instrumenteel gebruik te maken van gendergelijkheid, homorechten en antisemitisme om moslims en links in diskrediet te brengen. Het gebeurt waarschijnlijk al veel langer, omdat het al jaren duidelijk is dat het uitspelen van kwetsbare groepen een succesvolle strategie is. Het heeft zelfs invloed op hoe we in ons dagelijks leven met moslims omgaan.

Onderzoekers hebben een groot experiment uitgevoerd op treinstations verspreid door Duitsland. Een actrice heeft een tas met citroenen in haar hand. De ene helft van de tijd heeft ze een hoofddoek om, de andere helft van de tijd niet. In het bijzijn van omstanders laat ze haar tas met citroenen vallen. De vraag is: hoeveel mensen helpen haar om de citroenen op te rapen? Wat blijkt: de vrouw krijgt significant meer hulp als ze haar hoofddoek niet om heeft. Echter, er is een uitweg. Als de vrouw met hoofddoek voorafgaand aan het citroenenincident zich in een fictief telefoongesprek uitspreekt voor gendergelijkheid, krijgt ze net zoveel hulp als de vrouw zonder hoofddoek. Zo ingebed is de kwestie gendergelijkheid als het over moslims gaat: het beïnvloedt zelfs het gedrag van mensen op straat zonder dat ze er waarschijnlijk heel expliciet over nadenken. Soortgelijke resultaten zijn ook gevonden in een experiment over instrumenteel gebruik van homorechten tegen moslims.

De linkerzijde van het politieke spectrum combineert verzet tegen islamofobie met steun voor gendergelijkheid en homorechten, wat een ‘ongemakkelijke alliantie op sociale kwesties’ oplevert. Van deze ongemakkelijkheid wordt dankbaar gebruik gemaakt als wapen tegen moslims en links, tegelijkertijd. Nu de oorlog in Gaza voortduurt, blijken Judeonationalistische strategieën zich bij de femo- en homonationalistische repertoires aan te sluiten. En het zal niet de laatste strategie zijn waarmee kwetsbare groepen tegen elkaar uitgespeeld worden als wapen tegen moslims en links.

https://www.binnenlandsbestuur.nl/carriere/cyberveiligheid/antisemitisme-als-wapen-tegen-moslims-en-links